Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F1
Z: (08) 1900 ■ T: (02) 2318 ■
POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1422.1)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1396.6)PRESS■, PRESS (2190.6)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (2195.0)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (2191.0)SLOPER■ SLOPER (2192.1)
F3
Z: (07) 2096 ■ T: (04) 2260 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1547.5)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (2061.7)DELICATE■ DELICATE (2050.7)
F4
Z: (06) 2119 ■ T: (02) 2328 ■
POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1620.0)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1624.2)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1584.7)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1602.8)FINGERS■, FINGERS (2204.5)PINCH■, PINCH (2199.4)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (2206.4)
F2
Z: (08) 2038 ■ T: (03) 2300 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1558.4)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1487.8)SLOPER■, SLOPER (2127.3)DELICATE■, DELICATE (2123.5)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (2132.1)COORDINATION■ COORDINATION (2130.7)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2318 | 2 2300 | 3 2096 | 4 2328 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 S ANRAKU JPN Top 10 ▲ 22 better than predicted | 2029 | 1Z 1T ▲ 24 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 7 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 6 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 13 Elo | 99.3 | 2079 |
| 2 M SCHALCK FRA Top 10 ▲ 5 better than predicted | 2027 | 1Z 2T ▲ 20 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 20 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 4 Elo | 2Z ▼ 12 Elo | 83.9 | 2011 |
| 3 H V.DUYSEN BEL ▲ 21 better than predicted | 1977 | 1Z ▼ 6 Elo | 6Z ▼ 44 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 21 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 28 Elo | 68.8 | 1976 |
| 4 S AMAGASA JPN Top 10 ▲ 35 better than predicted | 1979 | 2Z ▼ 17 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 11 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 37 Elo | 5Z ▼ 27 Elo | 68.0 | 1909 |
| 5 A BARK ISR ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1854 | 2Z ▼ 2 Elo | 5Z ▼ 14 Elo | 6Z ▼ 19 Elo | 3Z ▲ 1 Elo | 38.4 | 1820 |
| 6 M MILNE GBR Top 10 ▲ 35 better than predicted | 1909 | 1Z ▲ 2 Elo | 4Z ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 42 Elo | 2Z ▲ 3 Elo | 29.3 | 1860 |
| 7 P JENFT FRA ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1878 | 1Z ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z ▲ 5 Elo | 7Z ▼ 22 Elo | - ▼ 41 Elo | 29.1 | 1827 |
| 8 C DUFFY USA Top 10 ▲ 32 better than predicted | 1858 | 3Z ▼ 12 Elo | 4Z ▼ 8 Elo | 2Z ▲ 1 Elo | - ▼ 31 Elo | 29.1 | 1811 |