Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F1
Z: (07) 2201 ■ T: (01) 2465 ■
MANTLE■, MANTLE (1551.7)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1575.2)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1540.8)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (2328.7)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (2333.2)PRESS■ PRESS (2330.3)
F2
Z: (08) 1964 ■ T: (03) 2314 ■
POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1437.8)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1425.9)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1415.7)SLOPER■, SLOPER (2164.9)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (2167.8)
F3
Z: (01) 2465 ■ T: (01) 2470 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1801.4)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1815.2)PRESS■, PRESS (1779.9)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (2373.1)SLOPER■ SLOPER (2375.6)
F4
Z: (05) 2246 ■ T: (04) 2286 ■
COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1629.1)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1656.1)FINGERS■, FINGERS (2091.5)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (2086.7)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (2092.6)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2465 | 2 2314 | 3 2470 | 4 2286 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 ▬ | 1987 | 3Z 4T ▲ 12 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 24 Elo | - ▼ 28 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 26 Elo | 74.2 | 2023 |
| 2 E MCNEICE GBR Top 10 ▲ 3 better than predicted | 2076 | 7Z ▼ 53 Elo | 1Z ▼ 6 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 30 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 15 Elo | 68.6 | 2062 |
| 3 A SANDERS USA Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2133 | 1Z ▼ 2 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 10 Elo | - ▼ 25 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 11 Elo | 59.7 | 2128 |
| 4 B RABOUTOU USA ▲ 20 better than predicted | 1914 | 7Z ▼ 14 Elo | 2Z ▼ 7 Elo | - ▼ 14 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 33 Elo | 43.8 | 1913 |
| 5 M SEKIKAWA JPN Top 10 ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 2020 | 2Z ▼ 4 Elo | 2Z ▼ 18 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | 2Z ▼ 13 Elo | 29.4 | 1967 |
| 6 M NAKAMURA JPN Top 10 ▲ 2 better than predicted | 2077 | - ▼ 61 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | - ▼ 75 Elo | 24.9 | 1954 |
| 7 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 2132 | 2Z ▼ 8 Elo | 2Z ▼ 20 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | - ▼ 74 Elo | 19.6 | 2010 |
| 8 L SAUREL FRA ▲ 32 better than predicted | 1906 | 7Z ▼ 5 Elo | 2Z ▼ 4 Elo | - ▼ 10 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | 19.1 | 1869 |