Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F1
Z: (08) 1890 ■ T: (00) 2469 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1379.0)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1386.5)DELICATE■, DELICATE (2391.7)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (2391.0)SLOPER■ SLOPER (2393.5)
F2
Z: (08) 1911 ■ T: (08) 1942 ■
FINGERS■, FINGERS (1407.4)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1431.1)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1718.5)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1725.6)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (1734.4)
F3
Z: (08) 1948 ■ T: (07) 2085 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1429.4)DELICATE■ DELICATE (1817.7)
F4
Z: (04) 2164 ■ T: (02) 2306 ■
FINGERS■, FINGERS (1567.6)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1550.2)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1583.0)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1564.8)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1592.3)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (2184.8)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (2189.8)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2469 | 2 1942 | 3 2085 | 4 2306 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Z AVEZOU FRA Top 10 ▲ 16 better than predicted | 1931 | 1Z ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 22 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 15 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 29 Elo | 84.4 | 1999 |
| 2 J GARNBRET SLO ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2130 | 1Z ▼ 8 Elo | 1Z 2T ▼ 1 Elo | 3Z 4T ▼ 26 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 18 Elo | 84.2 | 2113 |
| 3 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1941 | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 2Z 3T ▼ 6 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 9 Elo | 2Z ▲ 0 Elo | 69.2 | 1948 |
| 4 A SANDERS USA Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1974 | 2Z ▼ 9 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 15 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z ▲ 5 Elo | 69.1 | 1955 |
| 5 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 2091 | 1Z ▼ 9 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 13 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 11 Elo | - ▼ 35 Elo | 59.7 | 2080 |
| 6 E EDWARDS GBR ▲ 9 better than predicted | 1934 | 1Z ▲ 3 Elo | 2Z 3T ▼ 3 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 23 Elo | - ▼ 24 Elo | 59.5 | 1938 |
| 7 M SEKIKAWA JPN Top 10 ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1947 | 1Z ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 21 Elo | 2Z 4T ▼ 14 Elo | - ▼ 23 Elo | 59.4 | 1939 |
| 8 J BUCKLEY SLO ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1889 | 2Z ▼ 4 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 23 Elo | 3Z ▼ 44 Elo | - ▼ 22 Elo | 44.4 | 1845 |