Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F1
Z: (08) 1928 ■ T: (00) 2456 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1428.8)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1433.6)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1407.6)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (2399.8)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (2397.7)COORDINATION■ COORDINATION (2397.6)
F2
Z: (07) 2064 ■ T: (02) 2351 ■
SLOPER■, SLOPER (1517.2)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1548.5)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1504.7)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1549.6)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2235.0)FINGERS■, FINGERS (2235.0)COMPRESSION■ COMPRESSION (2231.4)
F3
Z: (08) 2016 ■ T: (05) 2214 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1476.3)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1495.6)DELICATE■ DELICATE (1962.7)
F4
Z: (05) 2187 ■ T: (01) 2411 ■
MANTLE■, MANTLE (1569.9)PRESS■, PRESS (1595.5)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1655.2)SLOPER■, SLOPER (2281.4)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2288.6)FINGERS■, FINGERS (2285.4)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (2285.2)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2456 | 2 2351 | 3 2214 | 4 2411 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 T ROBERTS GBR ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1841 | 3Z ▼ 2 Elo | 1Z ▲ 9 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 31 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 34 Elo | 69.4 | 1913 |
| 2 S ANRAKU JPN Top 10 ▬ | 2126 | 1Z ▼ 5 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 1 Elo | 3Z 4T ▼ 14 Elo | 1Z ▼ 5 Elo | 69.2 | 2103 |
| 3 H V.DUYSEN BEL Top 10 ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1933 | 1Z ▲ 5 Elo | 1Z ▲ 0 Elo | 5Z 5T ▼ 20 Elo | 1Z ▲ 2 Elo | 54.2 | 1920 |
| 4 M MILNE GBR Top 10 ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1873 | 1Z ▲ 8 Elo | 3Z ▼ 7 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 11 Elo | 2Z ▲ 0 Elo | 54.1 | 1885 |
| 5 D LEE KOR Top 10 ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 2113 | 1Z ▼ 6 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 11 Elo | 2Z ▼ 47 Elo | - ▼ 74 Elo | 44.6 | 2003 |
| 6 M SCHALCK FRA Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2003 | 2Z ▼ 10 Elo | 5Z ▼ 39 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 11 Elo | - ▼ 41 Elo | 44.0 | 1928 |
| 7 S AMAGASA JPN ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1954 | 1Z ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z ▼ 1 Elo | 2Z ▼ 22 Elo | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | 39.5 | 1940 |
| 8 N UZNIK AUT at home ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1887 | 3Z ▼ 9 Elo | - ▼ 44 Elo | 6Z ▼ 24 Elo | - ▼ 19 Elo | 19.1 | 1797 |