Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F1
Z: (05) 2114 ■ T: (05) 2124 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1479.8)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1512.7)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1959.8)FINGERS■ FINGERS (1957.3)
F2
Z: (06) 2057 ■ T: (04) 2246 ■
COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1436.8)PRESS■, PRESS (2083.8)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (2084.1)COORDINATION■ COORDINATION (2080.3)
F3
Z: (06) 2024 ■ T: (02) 2357 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1449.6)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1455.9)MANTLE■, MANTLE (2210.8)SLOPER■ SLOPER (2219.7)
F4
Z: (06) 1982 ■ T: (01) 2411 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1416.6)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1445.3)PRESS■, PRESS (1416.5)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2310.2)FINGERS■ FINGERS (2308.9)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2124 | 2 2246 | 3 2357 | 4 2411 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 A SANDERS USA Top 10 ▲ 2 better than predicted | 2042 | 4Z 4T ▼ 20 Elo | 7Z ▼ 66 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 27 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 29 Elo | 83.6 | 2012 |
| 2 Z AVEZOU FRA Top 10 ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1983 | 1Z 2T ▲ 21 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 23 Elo | 4Z 5T ▼ 14 Elo | 1Z ▼ 9 Elo | 84.0 | 2004 |
| 3 E MCNEICE GBR Top 10 ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1971 | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 18 Elo | 1Z ▼ 8 Elo | 2Z ▼ 11 Elo | 69.3 | 1996 |
| 4 N GROSSMAN USA ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 2141 | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | 2Z 4T ▼ 9 Elo | 1Z ▼ 16 Elo | 1Z ▼ 8 Elo | 69.3 | 2116 |
| 5 M NONAKA JPN ▬ | 2026 | 1Z 2T ▲ 14 Elo | 3Z 7T ▼ 20 Elo | 3Z ▼ 24 Elo | 1Z ▲ 2 Elo | 68.7 | 1998 |
| 6 A CALLIET FRA ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1981 | - ▼ 85 Elo | 3Z ▼ 14 Elo | 3Z ▼ 6 Elo | 4Z ▼ 13 Elo | 29.0 | 1869 |