Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F1
Z: (06) 2053 ■ T: (04) 2240 ■
COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1497.8)TECHNICAL■ TECHNICAL (2060.1)
F2
Z: (03) 2282 ■ T: (01) 2402 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1648.2)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1657.0)FINGERS■, FINGERS (2338.8)DELICATE■ DELICATE (2335.0)
F3
Z: (06) 1953 ■ T: (04) 2140 ■
TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1418.4)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1988.2)PINCH■, PINCH (1980.4)TECHNICAL■ TECHNICAL (1980.8)
F4
Z: (04) 2171 ■ T: (01) 2396 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1563.1)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1636.2)PRESS■, PRESS (1574.9)SLOPER■, SLOPER (2304.0)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (2300.1)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2240 | 2 2402 | 3 2140 | 4 2396 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 N GROSSMAN USA ▲ 1 better than predicted | 2115 | 5Z 7T ▼ 52 Elo | 5Z ▼ 28 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 21 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 23 Elo | 82.8 | 2033 |
| 2 N MEIGNAN FRA ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1984 | 2Z 2T ▲ 14 Elo | 6Z 6T ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z ▼ 32 Elo | 2Z ▲ 0 Elo | 68.9 | 1970 |
| 3 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 ▬ | 2006 | 3Z 6T ▼ 14 Elo | - ▼ 39 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 13 Elo | 1Z ▲ 0 Elo | 59.1 | 1969 |
| 4 A MATSUFUJI JPN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1930 | 6Z 7T ▼ 17 Elo | 5Z ▲ 0 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 5 Elo | - ▼ 36 Elo | 58.5 | 1886 |
| 5 Z AVEZOU FRA Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1757 | 7Z ▼ 9 Elo | - ▼ 10 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 33 Elo | - ▼ 15 Elo | 34.0 | 1758 |
| 6 M NAKAMURA JPN Top 10 ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1962 | 2Z ▼ 19 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | 3Z ▼ 27 Elo | 3Z ▲ 4 Elo | 29.2 | 1895 |