Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F1
Z: (06) 1422 ■ T: (06) 1422 ■
F2
Z: (05) 1784 ■ T: (03) 1933 ■
F3
Z: (06) 1634 ■ T: (02) 1932 ■
F4
Z: (05) 1582 ■ T: (02) 1857 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1422 | 2 1933 | 3 1932 | 4 1857 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 J GARNBRET SLO ▲ 1 better than predicted | 2179 | 1Z 1T ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 1 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 1 Elo | 99.6 | 2181 |
| 2 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1838 | 1Z 1T ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z 3T ▼ 20 Elo | 1Z 3T ▼ 15 Elo | 1Z ▼ 42 Elo | 84.2 | 1765 |
| 3 B RABOUTOU USA ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1751 | 1Z 1T ▲ 6 Elo | 7Z ▼ 129 Elo | 2Z ▼ 47 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 22 Elo | 68.9 | 1603 |
| 4 Z AVEZOU FRA Top 10 ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1708 | 1Z 1T ▲ 7 Elo | 5Z 7T ▼ 55 Elo | 3Z ▼ 56 Elo | 1Z ▼ 21 Elo | 68.8 | 1583 |
| 5 N GROSSMAN USA ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1820 | 1Z 1T ▲ 4 Elo | 2Z ▼ 63 Elo | 5Z ▼ 89 Elo | 1Z ▼ 25 Elo | 54.1 | 1647 |
| 6 A MORI JPN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1663 | 1Z 1T ▲ 9 Elo | - ▼ 72 Elo | 5Z ▼ 41 Elo | - ▼ 87 Elo | 34.4 | 1485 |