Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F2
Z: (06) 1798 ■ T: (04) 1959 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1466.8)DELICATE■ DELICATE (1797.2)
F4
Z: (04) 1964 ■ T: (03) 2014 ■
TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1566.2)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1564.1)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1561.4)MANTLE■, MANTLE (1882.8)FINGERS■ FINGERS (1886.1)
F1
Z: (04) 1917 ■ T: (03) 2024 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1505.7)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1511.9)PRESS■, PRESS (1888.2)MANTLE■ MANTLE (1888.5)
F3
Z: (06) 1676 ■ T: (03) 1998 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1367.7)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1898.5)FINGERS■ FINGERS (1897.8)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2024 | 2 1959 | 3 1998 | 4 2014 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 N GROSSMAN USA ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1871 | 2Z 2T ▲ 10 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 18 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 5 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 22 Elo | 99.3 | 1926 |
| 2 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1703 | 1Z 1T ▲ 32 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 19 Elo | 1Z ▼ 5 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 19 Elo | 84.4 | 1768 |
| 3 B RABOUTOU USA ▬ | 1699 | - ▼ 53 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 14 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 30 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 22 Elo | 74.4 | 1716 |
| 4 S GEJO SRB ▬ | 1689 | 1Z 1T ▲ 33 Elo | 6Z ▼ 59 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 26 Elo | 5Z ▼ 26 Elo | 68.6 | 1663 |
| 5 C MORONI ITA ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1781 | - ▼ 66 Elo | 6Z 6T ▼ 24 Elo | 2Z ▼ 16 Elo | - ▼ 48 Elo | 34.2 | 1634 |
| 6 M AOYAGI JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1650 | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 2Z ▼ 10 Elo | 1Z ▲ 2 Elo | - ▼ 51 Elo | 29.6 | 1599 |