Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F4
Z: (05) 1609 ■ T: (02) 1858 ■
POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1505.4)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1509.8)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1730.8)SLOPER■ SLOPER (1736.2)
F1
Z: (06) 1520 ■ T: (05) 1671 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1430.2)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1423.1)PRESS■, PRESS (1486.8)MANTLE■ MANTLE (1486.8)
F3
Z: (04) 1779 ■ T: (02) 1847 ■
TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1576.0)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1585.5)PRESS■, PRESS (1770.5)MANTLE■ MANTLE (1770.5)
F2
Z: (04) 1788 ■ T: (01) 1946 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1590.8)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1571.4)PINCH■, PINCH (1858.1)COORDINATION■ COORDINATION (1862.1)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1520 | 2 1946 | 3 1779 | 4 1609 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 T NARASAKI JPN Top 10 ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1681 | 1Z 1T ▲ 10 Elo | 4Z ▼ 66 Elo | - ▼ 98 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 19 Elo | 59.3 | 1553 |
| 2 Y OGATA JPN ▬ | 1640 | 1Z 1T ▲ 11 Elo | - ▼ 84 Elo | 7Z ▼ 48 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 17 Elo | 58.1 | 1509 |
| 3 M SCHALCK FRA Top 10 ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1647 | 2Z 2T ▼ 17 Elo | 4Z 5T ▼ 4 Elo | - ▼ 69 Elo | 3Z ▼ 46 Elo | 59.0 | 1516 |
| 4 P JENFT FRA ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1509 | 3Z 3T ▼ 25 Elo | - ▼ 49 Elo | 7Z 7T ▲ 20 Elo | 3Z ▼ 28 Elo | 58.2 | 1431 |
| 5 C DUFFY USA Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1554 | 2Z ▼ 86 Elo | 5Z ▼ 5 Elo | 7Z 7T ▲ 13 Elo | 1Z ▼ 9 Elo | 52.3 | 1467 |
| 6 K FUJII JPN ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1635 | 3Z 4T ▼ 32 Elo | 7Z ▼ 30 Elo | 7Z ▼ 33 Elo | - ▼ 75 Elo | 42.2 | 1472 |