Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F1
Z: (06) 1473 ■ T: (01) 1932 ■
F2
Z: (04) 1815 ■ T: (03) 1865 ■
F3
Z: (04) 1739 ■ T: (02) 1874 ■
F4
Z: (05) 1667 ■ T: (02) 1883 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1932 | 2 1865 | 3 1874 | 4 1883 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 J GARNBRET SLO ▲ 1 better than predicted | 2231 | 1Z 1T ▲ 0 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 18 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 19 Elo | 1Z 2T ▼ 8 Elo | 99.3 | 2186 |
| 2 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1548 | 4Z ▼ 58 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 4 Elo | 1Z 4T ▲ 26 Elo | 1Z ▼ 25 Elo | 68.7 | 1487 |
| 3 N GROSSMAN USA ▬ | 1658 | 1Z ▼ 16 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 16 Elo | 1Z ▼ 25 Elo | 5Z 7T ▼ 42 Elo | 68.8 | 1559 |
| 4 A NOGUCHI JPN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1854 | 1Z ▼ 35 Elo | - ▼ 152 Elo | 3Z ▼ 49 Elo | 3Z ▼ 40 Elo | 29.3 | 1587 |
| 5 V LUKAN SLO ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1613 | 1Z ▼ 6 Elo | 2Z ▼ 21 Elo | - ▼ 78 Elo | - ▼ 61 Elo | 19.7 | 1459 |
| 6 K DEBEVEC SLO ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1686 | 1Z ▼ 12 Elo | - ▼ 77 Elo | - ▼ 66 Elo | 5Z ▼ 25 Elo | 19.4 | 1517 |