Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F1
Z: (06) 1906 ■ T: (06) 1908 ■
F2
Z: (06) 1927 ■ T: (06) 1929 ■
F3
Z: (02) 2246 ■ T: (02) 2257 ■
F4
Z: (06) 2099 ■ T: (06) 2087 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1908 | 2 1929 | 3 2257 | 4 2087 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 J HOJER GER ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1957 | 1Z 1T ▲ 22 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 33 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 2 Elo | 99.4 | 2012 |
| 2 D SHARAFUTDI. RUS ▲ 2 better than predicted | 2076 | 1Z 1T ▲ 14 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 14 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 7 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 6 Elo | 99.3 | 2105 |
| 3 K FISCHHUBER AUT at home ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2011 | 1Z 1T ▲ 17 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 16 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 17 Elo | 74.7 | 2046 |
| 4 S MCCOLL CAN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2088 | 1Z 1T ▲ 12 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 6 Elo | - ▼ 14 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 32 Elo | 74.5 | 2064 |
| 5 J VERHOEVEN NED ▲ 1 better than predicted | 2036 | 1Z 1T ▲ 14 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 14 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 38 Elo | 74.4 | 2010 |
| 6 G G.MONDET FRA ▲ 1 better than predicted | 2056 | 1Z 1T ▲ 12 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 13 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | 6Z 6T ▼ 62 Elo | 74.2 | 2003 |