Prague
World Cup 2025
June 5, 2025
171 Athletes
18.3°C 🌡 71% 🌢
Head Setter: Manuel Hassler
Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F1
Z: (08) 1779 ■ T: (08) 1852 ■
TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1354.1)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1346.0)PINCH■, PINCH (1348.7)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1374.5)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1649.0)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1651.9)TECHNICAL■ TECHNICAL (1637.8)
F2
Z: (06) 2152 ■ T: (01) 2344 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1634.6)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1669.4)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1692.8)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (2221.8)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (2211.8)TECHNICAL■ TECHNICAL (2213.0)
F3
Z: (08) 1799 ■ T: (07) 1911 ■
PRESS■, PRESS (1382.9)MANTLE■, MANTLE (1368.1)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1408.3)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1736.9)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1725.2)COMPRESSION■ COMPRESSION (1719.7)
F4
Z: (08) 1837 ■ T: (03) 2203 ■
MANTLE■, MANTLE (1398.9)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1451.4)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1443.4)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (2060.3)PRESS■, PRESS (2047.9)TECHNICAL■ TECHNICAL (2048.0)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1852 | 2 2344 | 3 1911 | 4 2203 | Post-Elo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 M SCHALCK FRA Top 10 ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1947 | 1Z 1T ▲ 16 Elo | 3Z 7T ▼ 8 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 17 Elo | 3Z 4T ▼ 15 Elo | 98.7 | 1957 |
| 2 S ANRAKU JPN Top 10 ▬ | 2000 | 1Z 1T ▲ 12 Elo | 7Z ▼ 62 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 16 Elo | 2Z 4T ▼ 3 Elo | 83.7 | 1963 |
| 3 S RICHARD FRA Top 10 ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1828 | 2Z 3T ▼ 4 Elo | 5Z ▼ 8 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 9 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 26 Elo | 83.7 | 1851 |
| 4 S AMAGASA JPN Top 10 ▬ | 1864 | 1Z 1T ▲ 20 Elo | 6Z ▼ 20 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 20 Elo | 1Z ▼ 11 Elo | 69.1 | 1873 |
| 5 Y PAN CHN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1806 | 2Z 3T ▼ 2 Elo | 6Z ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 15 Elo | 1Z ▼ 4 Elo | 68.8 | 1808 |
| 6 H V.DUYSEN BEL Top 10 ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1789 | 1Z 3T ▲ 8 Elo | 7Z ▼ 8 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 15 Elo | 1Z ▲ 0 Elo | 68.6 | 1804 |
| 7 D LEE KOR Top 10 ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1930 | 1Z 1T ▲ 14 Elo | - ▼ 48 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z ▼ 4 Elo | 59.6 | 1889 |
| 8 A PEHARC SLO ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1770 | 1Z 3T ▲ 8 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | 3Z ▼ 35 Elo | 5Z ▼ 21 Elo | 43.9 | 1704 |