Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F1
Z: (02) 1878 ■ T: (02) 1865 ■
F2
Z: (05) 1537 ■ T: (05) 1605 ■
F3
Z: (02) 1876 ■ T: (02) 1863 ■
F4
Z: (03) 1664 ■ T: (02) 1756 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1865 | 2 1605 | 3 1863 | 4 1756 | Post-Elo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 J HOJER GER ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1808 | 7Z 7T ▼ 93 Elo | 1Z 2T ▼ 5 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 65 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 14 Elo | 97.4 | 1659 |
| 2 D SHARAFUTDI. RUS ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1891 | 3Z 3T ▼ 29 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 5 Elo | - ▼ 48 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 11 Elo | 74.5 | 1841 |
| 3 J VERHOEVEN NED ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1796 | - ▼ 35 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 23 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 53 Elo | - ▼ 42 Elo | 49.1 | 1662 |
| 4 J KASSAY AUS ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1653 | - ▼ 20 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 14 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | - ▼ 34 Elo | 24.9 | 1612 |
| 5 G G.MONDET FRA ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1818 | - ▼ 36 Elo | 1Z 3T ▼ 23 Elo | - ▼ 30 Elo | 1Z ▼ 13 Elo | 34.6 | 1732 |
| 6 V TIMONOV RUS ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1604 | - ▼ 21 Elo | - ▼ 62 Elo | - ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 31 Elo | 0.0 | 1507 |