Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F1
Z: (06) 1821 ■ T: (06) 2043 ■
F2
Z: (04) 2012 ■ T: (00) 2339 ■
F3
Z: (04) 2101 ■ T: (03) 2162 ■
F4
Z: (05) 1938 ■ T: (01) 2249 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2043 | 2 2339 | 3 2162 | 4 2249 | Post-Elo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 S MCCOLL CAN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1957 | 1Z 1T ▲ 17 Elo | 4Z ▼ 14 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 27 Elo | 84.1 | 1989 |
| 2 J HOJER GER ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1900 | 1Z 2T ▲ 10 Elo | - ▼ 15 Elo | 6Z 6T ▼ 16 Elo | 2Z ▲ 0 Elo | 59.0 | 1885 |
| 3 D SHARAFUTDI. RUS ▬ | 2014 | 1Z 5T ▼ 32 Elo | - ▼ 19 Elo | 5Z 5T ▼ 19 Elo | 2Z ▼ 6 Elo | 58.8 | 1945 |
| 4 C LACHAT SUI ▲ 2 better than predicted | 2060 | 1Z 2T ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z ▲ 5 Elo | - ▼ 50 Elo | 1Z ▼ 3 Elo | 44.6 | 2025 |
| 5 J KASSAY AUS ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1853 | 1Z 4T ▲ 4 Elo | 3Z ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z ▲ 9 Elo | 1Z ▲ 7 Elo | 54.1 | 1877 |
| 6 T TAUPORN GER ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2008 | 1Z 5T ▼ 28 Elo | 1Z ▲ 11 Elo | - ▼ 37 Elo | - ▼ 42 Elo | 34.4 | 1937 |