Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S1
Z: (12) 2143 ■ T: (00) 2386 ■
PRESS■, PRESS (1700.6)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1721.1)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1729.4)PRESS■, PRESS (2313.2)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (2315.7)DELICATE■ DELICATE (2316.0)
S2
Z: (14) 2119 ■ T: (04) 2308 ■
SLOPER■, SLOPER (1720.4)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1762.4)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1744.9)SLOPER■, SLOPER (2121.2)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2133.3)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (2127.0)
S3
Z: (18) 1965 ■ T: (03) 2283 ■
FINGERS■, FINGERS (1583.4)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1593.6)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1566.1)FINGERS■, FINGERS (2153.0)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2160.7)TECHNICAL■ TECHNICAL (2153.0)
S4
Z: (24) 1802 ■ T: (07) 2264 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1429.3)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1388.6)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (2034.0)COORDINATION■ COORDINATION (2016.5)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2386 | 2 2308 | 3 2283 | 4 2264 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 J GARNBRET SLO Top 10 ▬ | 1943 | 1Z ▲ 10 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 29 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 15 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 12 Elo | 84.6 | 2009 |
| 2 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▬ | 1959 | 1Z ▲ 9 Elo | 4Z ▼ 26 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 28 Elo | 2Z 4T ▼ 1 Elo | 69.3 | 1969 |
| 3 A SANDERS USA Top 10 ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1716 | 1Z ▲ 16 Elo | 5Z 6T ▲ 21 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 34 Elo | 2Z ▼ 7 Elo | 69.0 | 1780 |
| 4 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 ▬ | 1847 | - ▼ 32 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 33 Elo | 2Z ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z 4T ▲ 20 Elo | 59.6 | 1871 |
| 5 M SEKIKAWA JPN Top 10 ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1875 | 4Z ▼ 5 Elo | 1Z ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 12 Elo | 54.4 | 1889 |
| 6 Z AVEZOU FRA Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1777 | 5Z ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 34 Elo | 1Z ▲ 8 Elo | 4Z ▼ 26 Elo | 54.3 | 1793 |
| 7 E EDWARDS GBR Top 10 ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1892 | - ▼ 37 Elo | 1Z ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z ▲ 5 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 27 Elo | 45.0 | 1894 |
| 8 J E.BUCKLEY SLO ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1888 | 2Z ▲ 6 Elo | 4Z ▼ 24 Elo | - ▼ 50 Elo | 1Z 7T ▲ 14 Elo | 44.0 | 1841 |
| 9 Y ZHANG CHN at home ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1754 | 2Z ▲ 13 Elo | 2Z ▲ 7 Elo | 1Z ▲ 11 Elo | 3Z ▼ 16 Elo | 39.6 | 1769 |
| 10 A MATSUFUJI JPN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1771 | 4Z ▲ 4 Elo | 5Z ▼ 12 Elo | 1Z ▲ 9 Elo | 1Z ▲ 1 Elo | 39.3 | 1773 |
| 11 E MCNEICE GBR Top 10 ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1841 | - ▼ 30 Elo | - ▼ 44 Elo | 1Z ▲ 9 Elo | 1Z 6T ▲ 21 Elo | 34.5 | 1805 |
| 12 A CALLIET FRA ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1798 | 2Z ▲ 11 Elo | - ▼ 38 Elo | 2Z ▲ 3 Elo | 2Z ▼ 9 Elo | 29.7 | 1768 |
| 13 M RICHARDSON CAN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1795 | 2Z ▲ 10 Elo | - ▼ 34 Elo | 2Z ▲ 2 Elo | 4Z ▼ 22 Elo | 29.5 | 1754 |
| 13 M COSTANZA USA ▲ 8 better than predicted | 1609 | 1Z ▲ 18 Elo | 3Z ▲ 13 Elo | - ▼ 29 Elo | 4Z ▼ 1 Elo | 29.5 | 1613 |
| 15 C MORONI ITA ▬ | 1804 | - ▼ 28 Elo | 4Z ▲ 0 Elo | 2Z ▲ 2 Elo | 6Z ▼ 33 Elo | 29.1 | 1748 |
| 16 B RABOUTOU USA ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1622 | - ▼ 10 Elo | - ▼ 13 Elo | 2Z ▲ 12 Elo | 2Z ▲ 8 Elo | 19.8 | 1622 |
| 16 L ABRIAT FRA Top 10 ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 1877 | - ▼ 34 Elo | - ▼ 39 Elo | 3Z ▼ 8 Elo | 1Z ▲ 1 Elo | 19.8 | 1805 |
| 16 M AOYAGI JPN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1709 | - ▼ 14 Elo | - ▼ 13 Elo | 3Z ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z ▲ 9 Elo | 19.8 | 1698 |
| 19 F MATUELLA ITA ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1572 | - ▼ 7 Elo | - ▼ 9 Elo | 3Z ▲ 11 Elo | 2Z ▲ 9 Elo | 19.7 | 1578 |
| 19 F ITO JPN ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1751 | - ▼ 19 Elo | 3Z ▲ 9 Elo | - ▼ 45 Elo | 2Z ▲ 0 Elo | 19.7 | 1703 |
| 21 A CLARK USA ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1752 | 4Z ▲ 8 Elo | - ▼ 23 Elo | - ▼ 30 Elo | 2Z ▼ 1 Elo | 19.6 | 1714 |
| 22 M NONAKA JPN ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1707 | - ▼ 13 Elo | - ▼ 15 Elo | 3Z ▲ 6 Elo | 5Z ▼ 17 Elo | 19.4 | 1671 |
| 23 G TESIO ITA ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1811 | - ▼ 24 Elo | 6Z ▼ 2 Elo | - ▼ 34 Elo | 3Z ▼ 12 Elo | 19.3 | 1748 |
| 24 C COSCOY USA ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1641 | - ▼ 7 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | - ▼ 17 Elo | 3Z ▲ 3 Elo | 9.8 | 1613 |
