Keqiao
World Cup 2026

World Cup Keqiao 2026

April 30, 2026

142 Athletes

Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.

    Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty

    S1

    Z: (12) 2143 T: (00) 2386
    PRESS, PRESS (1700.6)TECHNICAL, TECHNICAL (1721.1)DELICATE, DELICATE (1729.4)PRESS, PRESS (2313.2)TECHNICAL, TECHNICAL (2315.7)DELICATE DELICATE (2316.0)

    S2

    Z: (14) 2119 T: (04) 2308
    SLOPER, SLOPER (1720.4)POWERFUL, POWERFUL (1762.4)DYNAMIC, DYNAMIC (1744.9)SLOPER, SLOPER (2121.2)POWERFUL, POWERFUL (2133.3)DYNAMIC DYNAMIC (2127.0)

    S3

    Z: (18) 1965 T: (03) 2283
    FINGERS, FINGERS (1583.4)POWERFUL, POWERFUL (1593.6)TECHNICAL, TECHNICAL (1566.1)FINGERS, FINGERS (2153.0)POWERFUL, POWERFUL (2160.7)TECHNICAL TECHNICAL (2153.0)

    S4

    Z: (24) 1802 T: (07) 2264
    DYNAMIC, DYNAMIC (1429.3)COORDINATION, COORDINATION (1388.6)DYNAMIC, DYNAMIC (2034.0)COORDINATION COORDINATION (2016.5)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.

The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
AthletePre-Elo1
2386
2
2308
3
2283
4
2264
Event ScorePost-Elo
1 J GARNBRET SLO Top 10 19431Z
▲ 10 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 29 Elo
2Z 2T
▲ 15 Elo
1Z 3T
▲ 12 Elo
84.62009
2 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 19591Z
▲ 9 Elo
4Z
▼ 26 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 28 Elo
2Z 4T
▼ 1 Elo
69.31969
3 A SANDERS USA Top 10 ▲ 6 better than predicted17161Z
▲ 16 Elo
5Z 6T
▲ 21 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 34 Elo
2Z
▼ 7 Elo
69.01780
4 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 1847-
▼ 32 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 33 Elo
2Z
▲ 0 Elo
1Z 4T
▲ 20 Elo
59.61871
5 M SEKIKAWA JPN Top 10 ▲ 1 better than predicted18754Z
▼ 5 Elo
1Z
▲ 3 Elo
1Z
▲ 4 Elo
2Z 3T
▲ 12 Elo
54.41889
6 Z AVEZOU FRA Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted17775Z
▲ 0 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 34 Elo
1Z
▲ 8 Elo
4Z
▼ 26 Elo
54.31793
7 E EDWARDS GBR Top 10 ▼ 4 worse than predicted1892-
▼ 37 Elo
1Z
▲ 2 Elo
1Z
▲ 5 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 27 Elo
45.01894
8 J E.BUCKLEY SLO ▲ 2 better than predicted18882Z
▲ 6 Elo
4Z
▼ 24 Elo
-
▼ 50 Elo
1Z 7T
▲ 14 Elo
44.01841
9 Y ZHANG CHN at home ▲ 3 better than predicted17542Z
▲ 13 Elo
2Z
▲ 7 Elo
1Z
▲ 11 Elo
3Z
▼ 16 Elo
39.61769
10 A MATSUFUJI JPN ▲ 1 better than predicted17714Z
▲ 4 Elo
5Z
▼ 12 Elo
1Z
▲ 9 Elo
1Z
▲ 1 Elo
39.31773
11 E MCNEICE GBR Top 10 ▼ 4 worse than predicted1841-
▼ 30 Elo
-
▼ 44 Elo
1Z
▲ 9 Elo
1Z 6T
▲ 21 Elo
34.51805
12 A CALLIET FRA ▲ 1 better than predicted17982Z
▲ 11 Elo
-
▼ 38 Elo
2Z
▲ 3 Elo
2Z
▼ 9 Elo
29.71768
13 M RICHARDSON CAN ▲ 1 better than predicted17952Z
▲ 10 Elo
-
▼ 34 Elo
2Z
▲ 2 Elo
4Z
▼ 22 Elo
29.51754
13 M COSTANZA USA ▲ 8 better than predicted16091Z
▲ 18 Elo
3Z
▲ 13 Elo
-
▼ 29 Elo
4Z
▼ 1 Elo
29.51613
15 C MORONI ITA 1804-
▼ 28 Elo
4Z
▲ 0 Elo
2Z
▲ 2 Elo
6Z
▼ 33 Elo
29.11748
16 B RABOUTOU USA ▲ 5 better than predicted1622-
▼ 10 Elo
-
▼ 13 Elo
2Z
▲ 12 Elo
2Z
▲ 8 Elo
19.81622
16 L ABRIAT FRA Top 10 ▼ 9 worse than predicted1877-
▼ 34 Elo
-
▼ 39 Elo
3Z
▼ 8 Elo
1Z
▲ 1 Elo
19.81805
16 M AOYAGI JPN ▲ 1 better than predicted1709-
▼ 14 Elo
-
▼ 13 Elo
3Z
▲ 3 Elo
1Z
▲ 9 Elo
19.81698
19 F MATUELLA ITA ▲ 5 better than predicted1572-
▼ 7 Elo
-
▼ 9 Elo
3Z
▲ 11 Elo
2Z
▲ 9 Elo
19.71578
19 F ITO JPN ▼ 2 worse than predicted1751-
▼ 19 Elo
3Z
▲ 9 Elo
-
▼ 45 Elo
2Z
▲ 0 Elo
19.71703
21 A CLARK USA ▼ 4 worse than predicted17524Z
▲ 8 Elo
-
▼ 23 Elo
-
▼ 30 Elo
2Z
▼ 1 Elo
19.61714
22 M NONAKA JPN ▼ 2 worse than predicted1707-
▼ 13 Elo
-
▼ 15 Elo
3Z
▲ 6 Elo
5Z
▼ 17 Elo
19.41671
23 G TESIO ITA ▼ 7 worse than predicted1811-
▼ 24 Elo
6Z
▼ 2 Elo
-
▼ 34 Elo
3Z
▼ 12 Elo
19.31748
24 C COSCOY USA ▼ 1 worse than predicted1641-
▼ 7 Elo
-
▼ 11 Elo
-
▼ 17 Elo
3Z
▲ 3 Elo
9.81613
HSF Logo

1.3.5_m.14

hadesoft@proton.me