Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F1
Z: (08) 1804 ■ T: (00) 2396 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1384.6)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1406.0)DELICATE■, DELICATE (2319.9)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (2324.9)
F2
Z: (08) 1824 ■ T: (08) 1862 ■
FINGERS■, FINGERS (1387.3)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1436.2)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1649.8)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (1683.3)
F3
Z: (08) 1876 ■ T: (07) 2009 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1436.7)DELICATE■ DELICATE (1764.5)
F4
Z: (04) 2100 ■ T: (02) 2217 ■
FINGERS■, FINGERS (1554.2)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1538.5)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1559.8)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1556.8)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1597.1)FINGERS■, FINGERS (2113.0)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (2111.4)SLOPER■, SLOPER (2114.9)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (2116.3)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (2120.4)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2396 | 2 1862 | 3 2009 | 4 2217 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Z AVEZOU FRA Top 10 ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1793 | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 19 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 31 Elo | 84.8 | 1875 |
| 2 J GARNBRET SLO Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2009 | 1Z ▼ 11 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 1 Elo | 3Z 4T ▼ 37 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 28 Elo | 84.4 | 1990 |
| 3 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1871 | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 2Z 3T ▼ 7 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 9 Elo | 2Z ▼ 1 Elo | 69.4 | 1876 |
| 4 A SANDERS USA Top 10 ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1780 | 2Z ▲ 1 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 0 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 12 Elo | 1Z ▲ 9 Elo | 69.2 | 1802 |
| 5 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1969 | 1Z ▼ 5 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 15 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 17 Elo | - ▼ 41 Elo | 60.0 | 1963 |
| 6 E EDWARDS GBR Top 10 ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1894 | 1Z ▲ 1 Elo | 2Z 3T ▼ 10 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 21 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | 59.7 | 1885 |
| 7 M SEKIKAWA JPN Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1889 | 1Z ▲ 1 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 19 Elo | 2Z 4T ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 24 Elo | 59.6 | 1873 |
| 8 J E.BUCKLEY SLO ▬ | 1841 | 2Z ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 21 Elo | 3Z ▼ 49 Elo | - ▼ 24 Elo | 44.7 | 1785 |