Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S2
Z: (25) 1509 ■ T: (02) 2189 ■
S4
Z: (21) 1940 ■ T: (14) 2067 ■
S1
Z: (25) 1723 ■ T: (03) 2250 ■
S3
Z: (13) 2114 ■ T: (13) 2096 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1723 | 2 2189 | 3 2114 | 4 2067 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 E MCNEICE GBR Top 10 ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1900 | 1Z 4T ▼ 26 Elo | 1Z ▼ 41 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 18 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | 84.5 | 1823 |
| 2 A SANDERS USA Top 10 ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1960 | 2Z ▼ 94 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 2 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 21 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 24 Elo | 84.4 | 1823 |
| 3 J GARNBRET SLO Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2082 | 3Z 4T ▼ 67 Elo | 1Z 3T ▼ 20 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 28 Elo | 2Z ▼ 124 Elo | 84.0 | 1843 |
| 4 M COSTANZA USA ▲ 20 better than predicted | 1669 | 3Z ▼ 48 Elo | 1Z ▼ 9 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 36 Elo | 1Z 4T ▲ 9 Elo | 69.5 | 1657 |
| 5 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 2076 | 1Z ▼ 59 Elo | 1Z ▼ 49 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 26 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 81 Elo | 69.2 | 1861 |
| 6 A KEREM ISR ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1757 | 2Z ▼ 27 Elo | 1Z ▼ 14 Elo | 5Z 5T ▼ 55 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 4 Elo | 68.9 | 1665 |
| 7 J E.BUCKLEY SLO ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1808 | 3Z ▼ 42 Elo | 1Z ▼ 16 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 18 Elo | 5Z 7T ▼ 74 Elo | 68.8 | 1694 |
| 8 A APEL GER ▲ 14 better than predicted | 1675 | 3Z ▼ 25 Elo | 7Z ▼ 86 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 33 Elo | 5Z 6T ▼ 7 Elo | 67.1 | 1524 |
| 9 M NONAKA JPN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1890 | 1Z ▼ 19 Elo | 1Z ▼ 17 Elo | 2Z 3T ▼ 25 Elo | 2Z ▼ 67 Elo | 54.6 | 1762 |
| 10 C CAULIER BEL ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1823 | 2Z ▼ 25 Elo | 2Z ▼ 29 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 21 Elo | 1Z ▼ 16 Elo | 54.4 | 1732 |
| 11 Y ZHANG CHN ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1737 | 2Z ▼ 16 Elo | 1Z ▼ 7 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 11 Elo | 2Z ▼ 27 Elo | 54.4 | 1676 |
| 12 C SEO KOR at home ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1778 | 3Z ▼ 31 Elo | 1Z ▼ 7 Elo | - ▼ 64 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 25 Elo | 44.8 | 1707 |
| 12 Z AVEZOU FRA Top 10 ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1858 | 1Z ▼ 15 Elo | 1Z ▼ 16 Elo | - ▼ 130 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 10 Elo | 44.8 | 1715 |
| 14 M SEKIKAWA JPN Top 10 ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1792 | 1Z ▼ 8 Elo | 2Z ▼ 27 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 12 Elo | - ▼ 107 Elo | 44.7 | 1671 |
| 15 L ABRIAT FRA Top 10 ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1845 | 1Z ▼ 5 Elo | 1Z ▼ 9 Elo | - ▼ 79 Elo | 2Z 4T ▼ 1 Elo | 44.6 | 1758 |
| 16 M NAKAMURA JPN ▼ 11 worse than predicted | 1946 | 1Z ▼ 19 Elo | 1Z ▼ 19 Elo | - ▼ 113 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 25 Elo | 44.4 | 1777 |
| 17 C MORONI ITA ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 1896 | 5Z ▼ 66 Elo | 1Z ▼ 9 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 11 Elo | - ▼ 94 Elo | 44.2 | 1745 |
| 17 F ITO JPN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1838 | 1Z ▼ 5 Elo | 1Z ▼ 13 Elo | - ▼ 55 Elo | 5Z 5T ▼ 27 Elo | 44.2 | 1743 |
| 19 A CALLIET FRA ▼ 12 worse than predicted | 1839 | 2Z ▼ 21 Elo | 1Z ▼ 8 Elo | - ▼ 55 Elo | 5Z 5T ▼ 22 Elo | 44.1 | 1737 |
| 20 T COHEN ISR ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1768 | 2Z 5T ▲ 18 Elo | 1Z ▼ 8 Elo | - ▼ 70 Elo | 6Z ▼ 41 Elo | 44.0 | 1671 |
| 21 F OBLASSER AUT ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1686 | 4Z ▼ 19 Elo | 2Z ▼ 14 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | 2Z 7T ▲ 19 Elo | 43.8 | 1652 |
| 22 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1826 | 1Z ▼ 2 Elo | 2Z ▼ 23 Elo | - ▼ 33 Elo | 4Z ▼ 31 Elo | 29.6 | 1740 |
| 23 M KUZUU JPN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1570 | 6Z ▼ 15 Elo | 1Z ▲ 7 Elo | - ▼ 13 Elo | 1Z ▲ 12 Elo | 29.5 | 1562 |
| 24 E EDWARDS GBR Top 10 ▼ 13 worse than predicted | 1841 | 1Z ▼ 3 Elo | 1Z ▼ 7 Elo | - ▼ 40 Elo | - ▼ 67 Elo | 20.0 | 1732 |
| 25 Z PEETERMANS GBR ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1600 | 3Z ▼ 1 Elo | 1Z ▲ 5 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | - ▼ 25 Elo | 19.8 | 1574 |
