Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F1
Z: (08) 1682 ■ T: (05) 1895 ■
F2
Z: (06) 1693 ■ T: (02) 1938 ■
F3
Z: (07) 1519 ■ T: (04) 1739 ■
F4
Z: (07) 1564 ■ T: (01) 1964 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1682 | 2 1938 | 3 1519 | 4 1564 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 J GARNBRET SLO Top 10 ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1843 | 2Z 5T ▼ 65 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 13 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 9 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 3 Elo | 99.4 | 1803 |
| 2 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1861 | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 6 Elo | 1Z ▼ 33 Elo | 85.0 | 1850 |
| 3 M COSTANZA USA ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1657 | 1Z 2T ▲ 10 Elo | 2Z ▼ 51 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 25 Elo | - ▼ 108 Elo | 59.8 | 1546 |
| 4 E MCNEICE GBR Top 10 ▬ | 1823 | 1Z 3T ▼ 18 Elo | 1Z ▼ 35 Elo | 1Z ▼ 38 Elo | 1Z ▼ 21 Elo | 54.8 | 1711 |
| 5 J E.BUCKLEY SLO ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1694 | 2Z 4T ▼ 25 Elo | - ▼ 100 Elo | 2Z ▼ 39 Elo | 2Z ▼ 4 Elo | 44.4 | 1534 |
| 6 A APEL GER ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1524 | 7Z ▼ 67 Elo | - ▼ 39 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 28 Elo | 2Z ▲ 1 Elo | 44.0 | 1451 |
| 7 A SANDERS USA Top 10 ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1823 | 7Z ▼ 130 Elo | 1Z ▼ 9 Elo | 1Z ▼ 25 Elo | 1Z ▼ 5 Elo | 39.3 | 1654 |
| 8 A KEREM ISR ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1665 | 2Z ▼ 29 Elo | 3Z ▼ 22 Elo | - ▼ 75 Elo | 2Z ▼ 7 Elo | 29.6 | 1544 |