Innsbruck
World Cup 2025

World Cup Innsbruck 2025

June 24, 2025

195 Athletes

Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.

    Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty

    S2

    Z: (08) 2417 ■ T: (01) 2548 ■
    DELICATE■, DELICATE (1831.8)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1826.5)PRESS■, PRESS (1809.1)PINCH■, PINCH (1810.4)PINCH■, PINCH (2379.5)SLOPER■, SLOPER (2381.7)DELICATE■, DELICATE (2383.4)PRESS■ PRESS (2380.1)

    S3

    Z: (20) 2071 ■ T: (00) 2533 ■
    COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1521.0)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1533.8)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (2437.3)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (2440.0)

    S4

    Z: (22) 1907 ■ T: (07) 2356 ■
    POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1341.6)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1337.2)SLOPER■, SLOPER (2090.5)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (2098.9)

    S1

    Z: (24) 1980 ■ T: (21) 2079 ■
    FINGERS■, FINGERS (1451.8)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1431.5)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1439.3)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1610.1)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1605.4)DELICATE■ DELICATE (1595.6)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.

The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
AthletePre-Elo1
2079		2
2417		3
2533		4
2356		Event ScorePost-Elo
1 A SANDERS USA Top 10 ▲ 2 better than predicted21142Z 2T
▼ 4 Elo
5Z 5T
▲ 1 Elo
1Z
▼ 3 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 12 Elo
84.02120
2 A MATSUFUJI JPN ▲ 9 better than predicted19677Z 7T
▼ 46 Elo
5Z
▲ 1 Elo
5Z
▼ 12 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 32 Elo
68.01942
2 G TESIO ITA ▲ 14 better than predicted19005Z 5T
▼ 7 Elo
7Z
▲ 1 Elo
4Z
▼ 4 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 29 Elo
68.01919
4 J GARNBRET SLO Top 10 ▼ 2 worse than predicted20781Z 1T
▲ 20 Elo
-
▼ 48 Elo
1Z
▲ 1 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 24 Elo
60.02079
5 M NAKAMURA JPN ▬20871Z 1T
▲ 19 Elo
-
▼ 39 Elo
3Z
▼ 17 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 18 Elo
59.72072
6 C MORONI ITA ▲ 2 better than predicted20044Z 4T
▼ 20 Elo
-
▼ 24 Elo
4Z
▼ 10 Elo
1Z 3T
▲ 21 Elo
58.91973
7 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▼ 6 worse than predicted21361Z 1T
▲ 8 Elo
1Z
▲ 2 Elo
2Z
▼ 8 Elo
1Z
▼ 16 Elo
54.92122
8 M SEKIKAWA JPN Top 10 ▲ 5 better than predicted19701Z 1T
▲ 25 Elo
6Z
▼ 2 Elo
2Z
▲ 0 Elo
1Z
▼ 6 Elo
54.41987
9 Z AVEZOU FRA Top 10 ▼ 3 worse than predicted20281Z 2T
▲ 13 Elo
7Z
▼ 10 Elo
2Z
▼ 2 Elo
1Z
▼ 5 Elo
54.02024
10 A KEREM ISR ▲ 4 better than predicted19056Z
▼ 48 Elo
6Z
▲ 9 Elo
1Z
▲ 13 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 28 Elo
53.91907
11 A CALLIET FRA ▼ 4 worse than predicted19701Z 1T
▲ 24 Elo
-
▼ 23 Elo
2Z
▼ 2 Elo
1Z
▼ 8 Elo
44.91963
12 K DEBEVEC SLO ▲ 8 better than predicted17252Z 2T
▲ 30 Elo
-
▼ 7 Elo
1Z
▲ 16 Elo
1Z
▲ 10 Elo
44.81774
12 E EDWARDS GBR Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted19241Z 2T
▲ 19 Elo
-
▼ 16 Elo
2Z
▲ 1 Elo
1Z
▼ 2 Elo
44.81928
14 M NONAKA JPN ▼ 4 worse than predicted19522Z 3T
▲ 4 Elo
-
▼ 18 Elo
1Z
▲ 10 Elo
1Z
▼ 8 Elo
44.71941
14 C SEO KOR ▲ 3 better than predicted17722Z 2T
▲ 24 Elo
-
▼ 7 Elo
2Z
▲ 9 Elo
1Z
▲ 7 Elo
44.71806
16 J E.BUCKLEY SLO ▬19023Z 3T
▲ 0 Elo
-
▼ 12 Elo
2Z
▲ 4 Elo
1Z
▲ 2 Elo
44.51897
16 E MCNEICE GBR Top 10 ▼ 13 worse than predicted21113Z 3T
▼ 15 Elo
-
▼ 30 Elo
2Z
▼ 13 Elo
1Z
▼ 13 Elo
44.52042
16 S E.MIMOUNE FRA Top 10 ▼ 3 worse than predicted19102Z 5T
▼ 4 Elo
-
▼ 11 Elo
1Z
▲ 10 Elo
1Z
▲ 0 Elo
44.51906
19 L ABRIAT FRA Top 10 ▼ 10 worse than predicted20002Z 2T
▲ 3 Elo
-
▼ 17 Elo
-
▼ 49 Elo
1Z
▲ 0 Elo
34.81946
20 A CLARK USA ▲ 1 better than predicted17713Z 4T
▲ 14 Elo
-
▼ 6 Elo
2Z
▲ 10 Elo
-
▼ 55 Elo
34.41741
21 A KOBETS UKR ▲ 1 better than predicted17486Z 6T
▲ 0 Elo
-
▼ 5 Elo
-
▼ 21 Elo
1Z
▲ 12 Elo
34.01738
22 S YOKOYAMA SUI ▼ 3 worse than predicted18132Z
▼ 19 Elo
7Z
▲ 15 Elo
-
▼ 21 Elo
1Z
▲ 9 Elo
29.31800
23 A APEL GER ▲ 1 better than predicted16717Z
▼ 11 Elo
-
▼ 3 Elo
4Z
▲ 12 Elo
1Z
▲ 12 Elo
29.01681
24 K MURAKOSHI JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted17936Z 7T
▼ 8 Elo
-
▼ 9 Elo
-
▼ 35 Elo
-
▼ 66 Elo
23.81687
HSF Logo

1.3.5_m.14

hadesoft@proton.me