Prague
World Cup 2025

World Cup Prague 2025

June 5, 2025

171 Athletes

Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.

    Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty

    S3

    Z: (15) 2052 T: (05) 2255
    TECHNICAL, TECHNICAL (1651.9)PRESS, PRESS (1657.6)DELICATE, DELICATE (1658.9)DELICATE, DELICATE (2046.1)TECHNICAL, TECHNICAL (2043.9)PRESS PRESS (2042.9)

    S4

    Z: (23) 1860 T: (02) 2315
    SLOPER, SLOPER (1465.5)POWERFUL, POWERFUL (1484.9)SLOPER, SLOPER (2203.6)POWERFUL POWERFUL (2207.8)

    S2

    Z: (19) 2105 T: (09) 2252
    POWERFUL, POWERFUL (1708.9)COORDINATION, COORDINATION (1653.0)TECHNICAL, TECHNICAL (1697.1)COORDINATION, COORDINATION (1931.8)POWERFUL, POWERFUL (1961.9)TECHNICAL TECHNICAL (1951.2)

    S1

    Z: (16) 2105 T: (03) 2327
    COORDINATION, COORDINATION (1641.2)DYNAMIC, DYNAMIC (1666.1)COMPRESSION, COMPRESSION (1672.1)COORDINATION, COORDINATION (2128.2)COMPRESSION, COMPRESSION (2132.3)DYNAMIC DYNAMIC (2134.6)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.

The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
AthletePre-Elo1
2327
2
2105
3
2052
4
2315
Event ScorePost-Elo
1 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 20421Z 1T
▲ 24 Elo
2Z 3T
▼ 9 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 22 Elo
1Z
▼ 17 Elo
84.72062
2 A CALLIET FRA ▲ 3 better than predicted17621Z
▲ 9 Elo
2Z 3T
▲ 23 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 32 Elo
1Z
▲ 2 Elo
69.61828
3 M SEKIKAWA JPN Top 10 ▲ 8 better than predicted18581Z
▲ 3 Elo
1Z 4T
▲ 17 Elo
3Z 3T
▲ 11 Elo
1Z
▲ 1 Elo
69.31890
4 E MCNEICE GBR Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted17401Z 2T
▲ 33 Elo
4Z 5T
▲ 7 Elo
3Z
▼ 2 Elo
1Z
▲ 7 Elo
69.01785
5 A MATSUFUJI JPN ▲ 4 better than predicted18452Z
▼ 6 Elo
3Z
▼ 26 Elo
3Z
▼ 10 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 30 Elo
54.51833
6 E EDWARDS GBR Top 10 ▲ 4 better than predicted17602Z
▲ 1 Elo
3Z 3T
▲ 17 Elo
2Z
▲ 2 Elo
2Z
▼ 1 Elo
54.31779
7 J E.BUCKLEY SLO ▲ 7 better than predicted18152Z
▼ 1 Elo
2Z 6T
▲ 14 Elo
4Z
▼ 23 Elo
1Z
▲ 5 Elo
54.01810
8 G M.MARTÍN ESP ▲ 11 better than predicted17053Z
▲ 1 Elo
7Z 7T
▲ 0 Elo
3Z
▲ 3 Elo
2Z
▲ 2 Elo
53.21711
9 M NONAKA JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted18081Z 1T
▲ 31 Elo
5Z
▼ 36 Elo
-
▼ 40 Elo
1Z
▲ 7 Elo
44.61775
10 L ABRIAT FRA Top 10 ▼ 3 worse than predicted1719-
▼ 40 Elo
6Z
▼ 10 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 35 Elo
1Z
▲ 9 Elo
44.41717
11 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 ▲ 4 better than predicted18043Z
▼ 9 Elo
2Z 5T
▲ 16 Elo
-
▼ 46 Elo
2Z
▼ 5 Elo
44.21764
12 A SANDERS USA Top 10 ▼ 10 worse than predicted1977-
▼ 86 Elo
6Z
▼ 50 Elo
5Z
▼ 19 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 27 Elo
44.11857
13 C CAULIER BEL ▲ 3 better than predicted17234Z
▲ 0 Elo
3Z
▼ 3 Elo
2Z
▲ 9 Elo
1Z
▲ 8 Elo
39.41737
14 F OBLASSER AUT ▲ 11 better than predicted16913Z
▲ 8 Elo
7Z
▼ 16 Elo
1Z
▲ 17 Elo
1Z
▲ 12 Elo
39.01712
15 A KEREM ISR ▼ 3 worse than predicted18057Z
▼ 23 Elo
7Z
▼ 24 Elo
2Z
▲ 4 Elo
2Z
▼ 6 Elo
38.51756
16 C MORONI ITA ▼ 10 worse than predicted1833-
▼ 45 Elo
7Z 7T
▼ 3 Elo
-
▼ 33 Elo
2Z
▼ 6 Elo
33.41756
17 K CONDIE USA 17261Z
▲ 13 Elo
7Z
▼ 14 Elo
-
▼ 26 Elo
1Z
▲ 8 Elo
29.11710
18 A MORI JPN ▲ 5 better than predicted1903-
▼ 54 Elo
-
▼ 51 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 31 Elo
-
▼ 85 Elo
24.91763
19 M NAKAMURA JPN ▼ 15 worse than predicted1860-
▼ 40 Elo
-
▼ 40 Elo
1Z
▲ 7 Elo
2Z
▼ 4 Elo
19.91790
20 L SAUREL FRA ▲ 2 better than predicted17012Z
▲ 12 Elo
-
▼ 21 Elo
-
▼ 21 Elo
4Z
▼ 7 Elo
19.61669
21 S GIACANI ITA 1711-
▼ 19 Elo
4Z
▲ 5 Elo
-
▼ 23 Elo
6Z
▼ 18 Elo
19.21661
22 A CLARK USA ▲ 2 better than predicted1634-
▼ 12 Elo
7Z
▲ 6 Elo
-
▼ 16 Elo
3Z
▲ 4 Elo
19.01619
23 S E.MIMOUNE FRA Top 10 ▼ 10 worse than predicted1807-
▼ 27 Elo
-
▼ 31 Elo
-
▼ 22 Elo
3Z
▼ 6 Elo
9.81730
24 C SEO KOR ▼ 4 worse than predicted1610-
▼ 9 Elo
-
▼ 12 Elo
-
▼ 11 Elo
4Z
▲ 3 Elo
9.71584
24 A HÖNIG GER ▼ 7 worse than predicted17484Z
▲ 8 Elo
-
▼ 23 Elo
-
▼ 18 Elo
-
▼ 47 Elo
9.71677
HSF Logo

1.3.5_m.14

hadesoft@proton.me