Salt Lake City
World Cup 2025

World Cup Salt Lake City 2025

May 23, 2025

112 Athletes

Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.

    Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty

    S2

    Z: (16) 1974 ■ T: (14) 2011 ■
    POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1644.9)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (1737.2)

    S3

    Z: (21) 1766 ■ T: (14) 1954 ■
    PINCH■, PINCH (1467.2)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1465.5)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1476.6)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1691.2)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1707.0)PINCH■ PINCH (1688.5)

    S4

    Z: (24) 1561 ■ T: (06) 2128 ■
    COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1188.4)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1184.0)PRESS■, PRESS (1178.7)PRESS■, PRESS (1939.2)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1943.8)COMPRESSION■ COMPRESSION (1943.2)

    S1

    Z: (22) 1848 ■ T: (17) 1969 ■
    DELICATE■, DELICATE (1498.7)MANTLE■, MANTLE (1516.0)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1671.8)MANTLE■ MANTLE (1680.9)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.

The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
AthletePre-Elo1
1969		2
2011		3
1954		4
2128		Event ScorePost-Elo
1 M NAKAMURA JPN ▲ 2 better than predicted17501Z 1T
▲ 26 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 29 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 25 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 26 Elo
100.01856
1 Z AVEZOU FRA Top 10 ▲ 2 better than predicted18791Z 1T
▲ 20 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 23 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 19 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 21 Elo
100.01962
3 N MEIGNAN FRA ▲ 3 better than predicted19451Z 2T
▲ 2 Elo
1Z 3T
▼ 2 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 16 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 11 Elo
99.61972
3 A SANDERS USA at home Top 10 ▼ 2 worse than predicted16901Z 1T
▲ 29 Elo
2Z 2T
▲ 21 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 23 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 25 Elo
99.61788
5 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 ▲ 7 better than predicted16671Z 1T
▲ 28 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 30 Elo
2Z 2T
▲ 16 Elo
1Z
▲ 2 Elo
84.81743
5 F ITO JPN ▲ 14 better than predicted18381Z 1T
▲ 20 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 23 Elo
2Z 2T
▲ 0 Elo
1Z
▼ 15 Elo
84.81866
7 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▼ 6 worse than predicted19451Z 2T
▲ 0 Elo
2Z 2T
▼ 6 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 5 Elo
1Z
▼ 14 Elo
84.61930
8 M NONAKA JPN ▬16931Z 1T
▲ 26 Elo
2Z
▼ 19 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 28 Elo
2Z 4T
▲ 12 Elo
84.51740
9 H GILLETT USA at home ▲ 10 better than predicted15691Z 1T
▲ 31 Elo
2Z 2T
▲ 28 Elo
2Z 4T
▲ 14 Elo
1Z
▲ 6 Elo
84.41648
10 C MORONI ITA ▼ 3 worse than predicted17442Z 7T
▼ 24 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 27 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 17 Elo
1Z
▼ 2 Elo
84.21762
11 E EDWARDS GBR Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted16995Z 5T
▼ 29 Elo
2Z 2T
▲ 21 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 22 Elo
2Z
▼ 7 Elo
83.81706
12 A CALLIET FRA ▼ 7 worse than predicted16502Z 2T
▲ 17 Elo
2Z 4T
▲ 11 Elo
1Z
▼ 17 Elo
1Z
▲ 5 Elo
69.41666
13 M SEKIKAWA JPN Top 10 ▼ 2 worse than predicted18431Z 3T
▼ 1 Elo
7Z 7T
▼ 70 Elo
1Z
▼ 17 Elo
1Z
▲ 1 Elo
68.41756
14 K CONDIE USA at home ▲ 1 better than predicted16131Z 1T
▲ 29 Elo
-
▼ 40 Elo
2Z 3T
▲ 18 Elo
1Z
▲ 5 Elo
59.71627
14 C CAULIER BEL ▼ 2 worse than predicted16451Z 3T
▲ 16 Elo
-
▼ 35 Elo
2Z
▼ 9 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 30 Elo
59.71650
16 A MATSUFUJI JPN ▼ 7 worse than predicted17201Z 2T
▲ 17 Elo
-
▼ 68 Elo
2Z 2T
▲ 15 Elo
1Z
▲ 3 Elo
59.71692
17 A HÖNIG GER ▼ 1 worse than predicted15892Z
▼ 14 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 36 Elo
1Z
▲ 0 Elo
1Z
▲ 5 Elo
54.91616
18 C COSCOY USA at home ▲ 3 better than predicted15882Z 4T
▲ 11 Elo
6Z
▼ 10 Elo
2Z
▼ 4 Elo
1Z
▲ 6 Elo
54.01591
19 S YOKOYAMA SUI ▼ 1 worse than predicted1626-
▼ 74 Elo
4Z 4T
▲ 24 Elo
2Z
▼ 4 Elo
1Z
▲ 9 Elo
44.31587
20 G TESIO ITA ▼ 6 worse than predicted16576Z
▼ 48 Elo
-
▼ 26 Elo
3Z 3T
▲ 12 Elo
1Z
▲ 5 Elo
44.11603
21 G OH KOR ▲ 2 better than predicted15306Z
▼ 18 Elo
-
▼ 19 Elo
4Z
▼ 8 Elo
3Z
▼ 2 Elo
29.01484
22 M KUZUU JPN ▲ 2 better than predicted16147Z
▼ 35 Elo
-
▼ 23 Elo
-
▼ 46 Elo
1Z
▲ 9 Elo
19.11526
22 M BURŠÍKOVÁ SVK ▼ 1 worse than predicted16077Z
▼ 30 Elo
-
▼ 25 Elo
-
▼ 46 Elo
2Z
▲ 2 Elo
19.11514
24 M RICHARDSON CAN ▼ 7 worse than predicted1723-
▼ 69 Elo
-
▼ 25 Elo
-
▼ 27 Elo
1Z
▲ 5 Elo
10.01621
HSF Logo

1.3.5_m.14

hadesoft@proton.me