Salt Lake City
World Cup 2025

World Cup Salt Lake City 2025

May 23, 2025

112 Athletes

Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.

    Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty

    S1

    Z: (09) 2177 ■ T: (04) 2263 ■
    TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1770.7)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1798.9)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1768.9)SLOPER■, SLOPER (2080.2)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (2079.3)FINGERS■ FINGERS (2091.1)

    S2

    Z: (17) 1984 ■ T: (07) 2154 ■
    POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1614.6)PINCH■, PINCH (1595.2)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1912.2)PINCH■ PINCH (1900.6)

    S4

    Z: (16) 2061 ■ T: (10) 2156 ■
    DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1708.6)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1674.5)PRESS■, PRESS (1688.2)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1888.3)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1860.8)PRESS■ PRESS (1872.3)

    S3

    Z: (13) 2094 ■ T: (03) 2270 ■
    FINGERS■, FINGERS (1728.0)FINGERS■ FINGERS (2087.7)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.

The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
AthletePre-Elo1
2263		2
2154		3
2270		4
2061		Event ScorePost-Elo
1 S ANRAKU JPN Top 10 ▬20235Z
▼ 61 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 22 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 24 Elo
4Z 4T
▼ 37 Elo
84.01971
2 D LEE KOR Top 10 ▬1828-
▼ 34 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 29 Elo
2Z 4T
▲ 16 Elo
3Z 3T
▲ 7 Elo
74.21849
3 M SCHALCK FRA Top 10 ▲ 1 better than predicted17864Z 4T
▲ 21 Elo
1Z
▲ 0 Elo
2Z
▼ 6 Elo
3Z 5T
▲ 4 Elo
68.71805
4 Y FUJIWAKI JPN ▲ 18 better than predicted17736Z 6T
▲ 13 Elo
4Z
▼ 27 Elo
7Z
▼ 24 Elo
4Z 7T
▲ 3 Elo
66.91738
5 S AMAGASA JPN ▼ 2 worse than predicted1801-
▼ 35 Elo
2Z 3T
▲ 17 Elo
2Z
▼ 2 Elo
3Z 5T
▲ 6 Elo
59.01790
6 R SUGIMOTO JPN ▲ 17 better than predicted17354Z
▲ 4 Elo
3Z 3T
▲ 14 Elo
4Z
▼ 9 Elo
5Z
▼ 22 Elo
53.61722
7 M NARASAKI JPN ▲ 3 better than predicted1776-
▼ 28 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 26 Elo
-
▼ 41 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 31 Elo
49.81770
8 C DUFFY USA at home ▲ 7 better than predicted1700-
▼ 20 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 32 Elo
3Z 3T
▲ 24 Elo
-
▼ 44 Elo
49.61696
9 H MCARTHUR GBR ▲ 7 better than predicted18102Z 2T
▲ 30 Elo
3Z
▼ 33 Elo
-
▼ 41 Elo
3Z
▼ 16 Elo
44.41754
10 T NARASAKI JPN Top 10 ▲ 2 better than predicted17515Z
▼ 1 Elo
-
▼ 53 Elo
4Z
▲ 0 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 34 Elo
44.31736
11 J MACDOUGALL GBR Top 10 ▼ 5 worse than predicted17333Z
▲ 6 Elo
-
▼ 32 Elo
2Z
▲ 6 Elo
5Z 5T
▲ 7 Elo
43.91725
12 H V.DUYSEN BEL Top 10 ▼ 7 worse than predicted1756-
▼ 26 Elo
2Z 2T
▲ 24 Elo
3Z
▲ 0 Elo
7Z
▼ 29 Elo
43.71728
13 D AKHTAR GBR ▼ 4 worse than predicted17444Z 4T
▲ 24 Elo
2Z
▼ 5 Elo
-
▼ 33 Elo
7Z
▼ 28 Elo
43.71706
14 P JENFT FRA Top 10 ▼ 3 worse than predicted1704-
▼ 15 Elo
1Z
▲ 8 Elo
-
▼ 24 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 35 Elo
35.01713
15 O BAUDRAND CAN ▲ 2 better than predicted1661-
▼ 16 Elo
2Z
▲ 4 Elo
-
▼ 19 Elo
5Z 6T
▲ 16 Elo
34.01649
16 M MILNE GBR ▼ 9 worse than predicted20102Z
▼ 14 Elo
3Z
▼ 47 Elo
-
▼ 58 Elo
-
▼ 83 Elo
19.71820
17 T LEMAGNER FRA ▼ 3 worse than predicted1710-
▼ 17 Elo
1Z
▲ 9 Elo
6Z
▲ 1 Elo
-
▼ 33 Elo
19.51675
18 A PEHARC SLO ▼ 10 worse than predicted1730-
▼ 18 Elo
2Z
▲ 0 Elo
6Z
▲ 0 Elo
-
▼ 33 Elo
19.41684
19 N RUSEV BUL ▼ 6 worse than predicted1627-
▼ 11 Elo
3Z
▲ 2 Elo
-
▼ 13 Elo
-
▼ 18 Elo
9.81591
20 E A.KRÜGER GER ▼ 1 worse than predicted1715-
▼ 16 Elo
-
▼ 31 Elo
-
▼ 13 Elo
5Z
▲ 1 Elo
9.61664
20 A INTRACHUPO. THA ▬1667-
▼ 12 Elo
-
▼ 40 Elo
5Z
▲ 10 Elo
-
▼ 18 Elo
9.61613
22 R GRUBER AUT ▲ 2 better than predicted1601-
▼ 9 Elo
-
▼ 24 Elo
-
▼ 11 Elo
7Z
▲ 7 Elo
9.31568
23 A SHAHAR USA at home ▼ 5 worse than predicted1854-
▼ 32 Elo
-
▼ 59 Elo
-
▼ 27 Elo
-
▼ 32 Elo
0.01717
23 J WIMMER AUT ▼ 4 worse than predicted1663-
▼ 9 Elo
-
▼ 22 Elo
-
▼ 10 Elo
-
▼ 17 Elo
0.01610
HSF Logo

1.3.5_m.14

hadesoft@proton.me