Curitiba
World Cup 2025

World Cup Curitiba 2025

May 16, 2025

103 Athletes

Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.

    Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty

    S1

    Z: (17) 1894 T: (08) 2096
    DELICATE, DELICATE (1598.4)DELICATE DELICATE (1890.6)

    S3

    Z: (18) 1909 T: (10) 2049
    POWERFUL, POWERFUL (1612.8)FINGERS, FINGERS (1622.7)FINGERS, FINGERS (1834.3)POWERFUL POWERFUL (1824.6)

    S4

    Z: (10) 2060 T: (01) 2248
    COORDINATION, COORDINATION (1766.0)SLOPER, SLOPER (1751.8)POWERFUL, POWERFUL (1754.2)SLOPER, SLOPER (2146.5)COORDINATION, COORDINATION (2152.2)POWERFUL POWERFUL (2149.6)

    S2

    Z: (20) 1835 T: (06) 2159
    COORDINATION, COORDINATION (1547.7)DYNAMIC, DYNAMIC (1550.7)PRESS, PRESS (1541.6)SLOPER, SLOPER (1535.0)COORDINATION, COORDINATION (1977.2)PRESS, PRESS (1972.0)SLOPER, SLOPER (1967.2)DYNAMIC DYNAMIC (1990.0)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.

The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
AthletePre-Elo1
1894
2
1835
3
1909
4
2248
Event ScorePost-Elo
1 S ANRAKU JPN Top 10 18711Z 1T
▲ 25 Elo
2Z 2T
▲ 8 Elo
2Z 2T
▲ 5 Elo
3Z 3T
▲ 9 Elo
99.21918
2 T NARASAKI JPN Top 10 ▲ 7 better than predicted16551Z 1T
▲ 34 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 32 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 31 Elo
2Z
▲ 5 Elo
84.91757
3 M SCHALCK FRA Top 10 16235Z 5T
▲ 12 Elo
2Z 3T
▲ 25 Elo
2Z 2T
▲ 25 Elo
5Z
▼ 1 Elo
83.31684
4 J POSCH AUT ▲ 8 better than predicted15574Z
▲ 0 Elo
5Z 7T
▲ 14 Elo
3Z 3T
▲ 25 Elo
4Z
▲ 8 Elo
67.91604
5 A PEHARC SLO 16891Z 4T
▲ 22 Elo
-
▼ 58 Elo
2Z 3T
▲ 20 Elo
2Z
▲ 8 Elo
59.31686
6 S AMAGASA JPN ▼ 4 worse than predicted1725-
▼ 61 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 30 Elo
3Z 4T
▲ 6 Elo
5Z
▼ 6 Elo
59.01699
7 Y FUJIWAKI JPN ▲ 10 better than predicted16824Z 6T
▲ 7 Elo
2Z 2T
▲ 23 Elo
6Z
▼ 42 Elo
-
▼ 27 Elo
58.51646
8 P JENFT FRA Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted16071Z
▲ 7 Elo
1Z
▲ 3 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 33 Elo
2Z
▲ 11 Elo
54.91661
9 M NARASAKI JPN ▼ 3 worse than predicted15941Z 1T
▲ 34 Elo
7Z
▼ 24 Elo
3Z
▼ 7 Elo
2Z
▲ 11 Elo
54.11608
10 A LEMAIRE FRA ▼ 2 worse than predicted17251Z 1T
▲ 30 Elo
5Z
▼ 37 Elo
3Z
▼ 16 Elo
-
▼ 24 Elo
44.41681
11 J WIMMER AUT ▲ 3 better than predicted15414Z 4T
▲ 21 Elo
2Z
▲ 6 Elo
3Z
▲ 0 Elo
-
▼ 12 Elo
44.11558
12 J CHON KOR ▼ 2 worse than predicted1737-
▼ 53 Elo
2Z
▼ 5 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 27 Elo
-
▼ 31 Elo
34.81684
13 N COLLIN BEL ▲ 3 better than predicted16522Z
▲ 0 Elo
-
▼ 43 Elo
1Z 3T
▲ 27 Elo
-
▼ 18 Elo
34.71625
14 T LEMAGNER FRA ▼ 3 worse than predicted1610-
▼ 34 Elo
3Z
▲ 3 Elo
4Z 6T
▲ 8 Elo
-
▼ 12 Elo
34.01579
15 H V.DUYSEN BEL Top 10 ▼ 11 worse than predicted1630-
▼ 35 Elo
3Z
▲ 1 Elo
2Z
▼ 1 Elo
1Z
▲ 15 Elo
29.71614
16 E A.KRÜGER GER ▼ 3 worse than predicted1630-
▼ 32 Elo
4Z
▼ 4 Elo
1Z
▲ 2 Elo
3Z
▲ 11 Elo
29.51611
17 N SARTIRANA ITA ▼ 2 worse than predicted15801Z
▲ 8 Elo
2Z
▲ 5 Elo
-
▼ 48 Elo
-
▼ 14 Elo
19.91537
18 J CLÉMENCE SUI 16761Z
▲ 6 Elo
-
▼ 42 Elo
3Z
▼ 11 Elo
-
▼ 14 Elo
19.81622
18 I FIDEL ISR ▲ 4 better than predicted16162Z
▲ 6 Elo
2Z
▲ 5 Elo
-
▼ 30 Elo
-
▼ 11 Elo
19.81592
20 L TRANDAFIR GER ▲ 1 better than predicted16213Z
▼ 2 Elo
2Z
▲ 4 Elo
-
▼ 58 Elo
-
▼ 18 Elo
19.71554
21 L V.FREIER GER ▼ 2 worse than predicted16204Z
▼ 6 Elo
1Z
▲ 10 Elo
-
▼ 35 Elo
-
▼ 13 Elo
19.71583
22 R SUGIMOTO JPN ▼ 2 worse than predicted1689-
▼ 43 Elo
3Z
▼ 4 Elo
3Z
▼ 3 Elo
-
▼ 17 Elo
19.61629
23 T WÜRTHNER GER ▼ 1 worse than predicted1508-
▼ 19 Elo
3Z
▲ 8 Elo
-
▼ 21 Elo
-
▼ 7 Elo
9.81474
24 M KLEESATTEL GER ▲ 1 better than predicted15665Z
▲ 1 Elo
-
▼ 32 Elo
-
▼ 23 Elo
-
▼ 8 Elo
9.61510
25 L FAVOT FRA ▼ 1 worse than predicted1588-
▼ 28 Elo
-
▼ 28 Elo
-
▼ 22 Elo
-
▼ 4 Elo
0.01515
HSF Logo

1.3.5_m.14

hadesoft@proton.me