Curitiba
World Cup 2025

World Cup Curitiba 2025

May 16, 2025

103 Athletes

Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.

    Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty

    S2

    Z: (23) 1709 T: (05) 2135
    PRESS, PRESS (1389.5)COORDINATION, COORDINATION (1395.3)COORDINATION, COORDINATION (1951.3)PRESS PRESS (1948.5)

    S4

    Z: (15) 1899 T: (07) 2089
    PINCH, PINCH (1563.5)POWERFUL, POWERFUL (1570.0)COMPRESSION, COMPRESSION (1568.4)PINCH, PINCH (1883.9)COMPRESSION, COMPRESSION (1887.9)POWERFUL POWERFUL (1892.3)

    S1

    Z: (15) 2002 T: (01) 2275
    DELICATE, DELICATE (1683.3)PRESS, PRESS (1682.5)PRESS, PRESS (2146.7)DELICATE DELICATE (2148.0)

    S3

    Z: (22) 1753 T: (06) 2143
    TECHNICAL, TECHNICAL (1455.0)DYNAMIC, DYNAMIC (1455.9)DYNAMIC, DYNAMIC (1937.4)TECHNICAL TECHNICAL (1930.0)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.

The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
AthletePre-Elo1
2275
2
2135
3
2143
4
1899
Event ScorePost-Elo
1 M SEKIKAWA JPN Top 10 ▲ 7 better than predicted16794Z
▼ 5 Elo
1Z 3T
▲ 27 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 27 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 32 Elo
84.41760
2 C MORONI ITA ▲ 4 better than predicted16731Z
▲ 7 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 28 Elo
3Z
▼ 18 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 32 Elo
69.71722
3 N MEIGNAN FRA ▲ 2 better than predicted19134Z
▼ 42 Elo
2Z
▼ 27 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 19 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 23 Elo
69.51886
3 A MATSUFUJI JPN ▲ 3 better than predicted16472Z
▲ 8 Elo
3Z
▼ 10 Elo
1Z 3T
▲ 28 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 31 Elo
69.51704
5 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▼ 4 worse than predicted18066Z
▼ 33 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 23 Elo
1Z
▼ 14 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 19 Elo
69.31801
6 F ITO JPN ▲ 11 better than predicted17032Z
▲ 2 Elo
4Z 5T
▼ 2 Elo
2Z
▼ 15 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 30 Elo
69.11718
7 M NAKAMURA JPN ▼ 5 worse than predicted16636Z
▼ 7 Elo
4Z
▼ 20 Elo
4Z 5T
▲ 6 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 31 Elo
68.51673
8 N SANDERS USA ▲ 11 better than predicted15511Z 2T
▲ 37 Elo
2Z
▲ 3 Elo
3Z
▼ 5 Elo
-
▼ 40 Elo
44.61550
9 C COSCOY USA ▲ 9 better than predicted16116Z
▼ 4 Elo
1Z
▲ 8 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 30 Elo
-
▼ 52 Elo
44.41597
10 G TESIO ITA 16635Z
▼ 7 Elo
2Z 3T
▲ 20 Elo
3Z
▼ 17 Elo
-
▼ 44 Elo
44.11619
11 M RICHARDSON CAN ▲ 2 better than predicted16691Z
▲ 11 Elo
1Z
▲ 4 Elo
3Z
▼ 15 Elo
1Z
▲ 6 Elo
39.81675
12 A HÖNIG GER 15953Z
▲ 7 Elo
3Z
▼ 7 Elo
2Z
▲ 2 Elo
3Z
▼ 2 Elo
39.31595
13 K CONDIE USA ▼ 2 worse than predicted15884Z
▲ 2 Elo
3Z
▼ 5 Elo
4Z
▼ 11 Elo
1Z
▲ 7 Elo
39.21581
14 A CALLIET FRA ▼ 10 worse than predicted1739-
▼ 49 Elo
2Z
▼ 7 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 27 Elo
-
▼ 60 Elo
34.81660
15 Z AVEZOU FRA Top 10 ▼ 12 worse than predicted19821Z
▼ 19 Elo
1Z
▼ 22 Elo
2Z
▼ 51 Elo
-
▼ 72 Elo
29.91826
16 Z PEETERMANS GBR ▲ 5 better than predicted1528-
▼ 12 Elo
2Z
▲ 6 Elo
2Z
▲ 6 Elo
2Z
▲ 11 Elo
29.71541
17 C CAULIER BEL ▼ 8 worse than predicted1654-
▼ 26 Elo
1Z
▲ 8 Elo
2Z
▼ 2 Elo
3Z
▲ 3 Elo
29.71640
17 S LETTNER AUT ▲ 4 better than predicted15491Z
▲ 15 Elo
4Z
▼ 9 Elo
1Z
▲ 10 Elo
-
▼ 20 Elo
29.71547
19 M KUZUU JPN ▲ 4 better than predicted1555-
▼ 18 Elo
5Z
▼ 12 Elo
3Z
▲ 0 Elo
1Z
▲ 14 Elo
29.41541
20 K DEBEVEC SLO ▼ 5 worse than predicted1700-
▼ 33 Elo
1Z
▲ 3 Elo
1Z
▲ 3 Elo
-
▼ 31 Elo
20.01650
21 H GILLETT USA ▼ 5 worse than predicted1586-
▼ 17 Elo
1Z
▲ 9 Elo
3Z
▼ 7 Elo
-
▼ 22 Elo
19.81554
22 G MEDICI ITA ▲ 2 better than predicted1595-
▼ 17 Elo
2Z
▲ 2 Elo
-
▼ 49 Elo
4Z
▲ 6 Elo
19.61544
23 A BESTVATER GER ▼ 3 worse than predicted1608-
▼ 17 Elo
3Z
▼ 9 Elo
-
▼ 41 Elo
4Z
▲ 5 Elo
19.51552
24 S YOKOYAMA SUI ▼ 10 worse than predicted1593-
▼ 14 Elo
-
▼ 50 Elo
3Z
▲ 4 Elo
-
▼ 15 Elo
9.81526
HSF Logo

1.3.5_m.14

hadesoft@proton.me