Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S2
Z: (17) 2023 ■ T: (07) 2337 ■
POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1446.3)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1443.1)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2066.5)COMPRESSION■ COMPRESSION (2063.4)
S4
Z: (18) 1958 ■ T: (12) 2165 ■
COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1398.3)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1425.4)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1816.0)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (1832.5)
S1
Z: (19) 2077 ■ T: (11) 2272 ■
MANTLE■, MANTLE (1496.5)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1531.7)MANTLE■, MANTLE (1872.4)DELICATE■ DELICATE (1890.6)
S3
Z: (20) 1907 ■ T: (18) 2006 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1350.7)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1344.2)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1342.6)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1604.6)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1596.2)COORDINATION■ COORDINATION (1591.8)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2272 | 2 2337 | 3 2006 | 4 1958 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 M NARASAKI JPN ▲ 8 better than predicted | 1960 | 1Z 1T ▲ 28 Elo | 4Z 4T ▲ 1 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 27 Elo | 99.1 | 2016 |
| 2 S AMAGASA JPN ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1998 | 6Z 7T ▼ 36 Elo | 1Z 5T ▲ 19 Elo | 2Z 5T ▼ 12 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 11 Elo | 97.6 | 1980 |
| 3 M MILNE GBR ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1934 | 1Z 2T ▲ 25 Elo | 1Z ▼ 1 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 10 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 27 Elo | 84.7 | 1995 |
| 4 D LEE KOR at home Top 10 ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 2051 | 4Z 5T ▼ 20 Elo | 1Z ▼ 16 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 19 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 21 Elo | 84.3 | 2055 |
| 4 J CHON KOR at home ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1960 | 4Z ▼ 32 Elo | 2Z 4T ▲ 18 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 25 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | 84.3 | 1997 |
| 6 T NARASAKI JPN Top 10 ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1975 | 1Z 5T ▲ 14 Elo | 2Z ▼ 23 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 20 Elo | 2Z 3T ▼ 4 Elo | 84.2 | 1982 |
| 6 M SCHALCK FRA Top 10 ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1909 | 3Z ▼ 18 Elo | 3Z 5T ▲ 9 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 25 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | 84.2 | 1951 |
| 6 P JENFT FRA Top 10 ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1801 | 3Z 3T ▲ 24 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 34 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 10 Elo | 2Z ▼ 10 Elo | 84.2 | 1859 |
| 9 R KAYOTANI JPN ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1955 | 6Z 6T ▼ 16 Elo | 1Z ▼ 4 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 22 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 24 Elo | 84.0 | 1981 |
| 10 D AKHTAR GBR ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1742 | 7Z ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 35 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 25 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 30 Elo | 83.9 | 1825 |
| 11 T LEMAGNER FRA ▬ | 1902 | 7Z 7T ▼ 12 Elo | - ▼ 54 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 12 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 28 Elo | 73.3 | 1881 |
| 12 C BARRON USA ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1740 | 3Z 3T ▲ 29 Elo | 1Z ▲ 11 Elo | 3Z 4T ▲ 3 Elo | 2Z ▼ 2 Elo | 69.0 | 1781 |
| 13 A SHAHAR USA ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1953 | 2Z ▼ 27 Elo | 2Z 4T ▲ 25 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 22 Elo | 2Z ▼ 47 Elo | 69.0 | 1882 |
| 14 S ANRAKU JPN Top 10 ▼ 11 worse than predicted | 2018 | - ▼ 76 Elo | 1Z ▼ 6 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 20 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 23 Elo | 60.0 | 1985 |
| 15 S AVEZOU FRA ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1909 | 2Z ▼ 1 Elo | - ▼ 56 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 10 Elo | 1Z 4T ▲ 14 Elo | 59.4 | 1881 |
| 16 J CLÉMENCE SUI ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1720 | 7Z 7T ▲ 21 Elo | - ▼ 17 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 30 Elo | 1Z ▲ 1 Elo | 58.7 | 1757 |
| 17 A PEHARC SLO ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1876 | 6Z ▼ 18 Elo | 1Z ▲ 9 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 7 Elo | 1Z ▼ 10 Elo | 54.3 | 1864 |
| 18 T ROMŠAK SLO ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1786 | 5Z 5T ▲ 20 Elo | 3Z ▲ 1 Elo | 2Z ▼ 24 Elo | 1Z ▲ 2 Elo | 53.9 | 1785 |
| 19 Y FUJIWAKI JPN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1828 | 7Z ▼ 14 Elo | 2Z ▲ 4 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 11 Elo | - ▼ 65 Elo | 43.3 | 1748 |
| 20 M CORNU FRA ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1906 | 2Z ▼ 2 Elo | 5Z ▼ 22 Elo | 3Z ▼ 46 Elo | - ▼ 62 Elo | 29.3 | 1780 |