Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S1
Z: (18) 1995 ■ T: (16) 2078 ■
FINGERS■, FINGERS (1458.6)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1463.2)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1666.6)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (1673.8)
S4
Z: (01) 2491 ■ T: (01) 2488 ■
TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1858.5)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1863.9)PRESS■, PRESS (1864.6)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (2348.0)PRESS■, PRESS (2348.7)DELICATE■ DELICATE (2348.7)
S2
Z: (17) 2035 ■ T: (02) 2459 ■
PRESS■, PRESS (1480.4)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1484.1)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (2316.1)PRESS■ PRESS (2316.6)
S3
Z: (13) 2124 ■ T: (01) 2456 ■
FINGERS■, FINGERS (1575.4)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1580.3)PRESS■, PRESS (1577.1)FINGERS■, FINGERS (2338.6)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2341.5)PRESS■ PRESS (2337.5)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2078 | 2 2035 | 3 2456 | 4 2488 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 N GROSSMAN USA ▬ | 2111 | 3Z 3T ▼ 4 Elo | 3Z ▼ 18 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 23 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 10 Elo | 83.8 | 2122 |
| 2 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 ▬ | 1999 | 1Z 1T ▲ 23 Elo | 1Z 5T ▲ 19 Elo | 2Z ▼ 5 Elo | - ▼ 31 Elo | 59.5 | 2007 |
| 3 N MEIGNAN FRA ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1996 | 3Z 3T ▼ 8 Elo | 1Z 5T ▲ 21 Elo | 2Z ▼ 2 Elo | - ▼ 25 Elo | 59.1 | 1983 |
| 4 Z AVEZOU FRA Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1698 | 1Z 1T ▲ 35 Elo | 1Z ▲ 13 Elo | 1Z ▲ 16 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | 45.0 | 1756 |
| 5 M NAKAMURA JPN ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1970 | 1Z 1T ▲ 23 Elo | 1Z ▼ 1 Elo | 3Z ▼ 11 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | 44.8 | 1962 |
| 5 A MATSUFUJI JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1925 | 1Z 1T ▲ 25 Elo | 3Z ▼ 15 Elo | 1Z ▲ 10 Elo | - ▼ 16 Elo | 44.8 | 1930 |
| 7 A APEL GER ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1841 | 2Z 3T ▲ 11 Elo | 1Z ▲ 8 Elo | 1Z ▲ 10 Elo | - ▼ 10 Elo | 44.7 | 1861 |
| 8 C SEO KOR ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1866 | 2Z 2T ▲ 15 Elo | 3Z ▼ 5 Elo | 2Z ▲ 5 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | 44.5 | 1871 |
| 9 J E.BUCKLEY SLO ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 2062 | 1Z 3T ▼ 8 Elo | 3Z ▼ 41 Elo | 3Z ▼ 20 Elo | - ▼ 28 Elo | 44.4 | 1967 |
| 10 E MCNEICE GBR Top 10 ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1723 | 1Z 1T ▲ 32 Elo | 1Z ▲ 14 Elo | - ▼ 10 Elo | - ▼ 4 Elo | 35.0 | 1759 |
| 10 A KEREM ISR ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1866 | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | - ▼ 40 Elo | 1Z ▲ 11 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | 35.0 | 1860 |
| 12 M DREAMER ISR ▲ 8 better than predicted | 1701 | 2Z 2T ▲ 24 Elo | 1Z ▲ 15 Elo | - ▼ 22 Elo | - ▼ 4 Elo | 34.8 | 1717 |
| 12 A HÖNIG GER ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1897 | 2Z 2T ▲ 5 Elo | - ▼ 41 Elo | 1Z ▲ 11 Elo | - ▼ 9 Elo | 34.8 | 1869 |
| 14 A KÜMIN SUI ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1750 | 2Z 2T ▲ 19 Elo | 4Z ▲ 5 Elo | - ▼ 26 Elo | - ▼ 4 Elo | 34.5 | 1747 |
| 14 M SEKIKAWA JPN Top 10 ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1903 | 3Z 3T ▼ 13 Elo | 2Z ▲ 3 Elo | - ▼ 35 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | 34.5 | 1856 |
| 16 M BURŠÍKOVÁ SVK ▬ | 1807 | 3Z ▼ 30 Elo | 4Z ▲ 5 Elo | 2Z ▲ 12 Elo | - ▼ 4 Elo | 29.4 | 1790 |
| 17 A BESTVATER GER ▬ | 1801 | 1Z 2T ▲ 20 Elo | - ▼ 32 Elo | - ▼ 23 Elo | - ▼ 4 Elo | 24.9 | 1769 |
| 18 K DEBEVEC SLO ▼ 10 worse than predicted | 2005 | 2Z ▼ 53 Elo | 4Z ▼ 14 Elo | - ▼ 36 Elo | - ▼ 10 Elo | 19.6 | 1898 |
| 19 S E.MIMOUNE FRA Top 10 ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1877 | - ▼ 85 Elo | 4Z ▲ 2 Elo | 3Z ▲ 10 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | 19.5 | 1805 |
| 20 S YOKOYAMA SUI ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1799 | - ▼ 56 Elo | 3Z ▲ 9 Elo | - ▼ 13 Elo | - ▼ 3 Elo | 9.8 | 1743 |