Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F3
Z: (06) 1953 ■ T: (04) 2139 ■
TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1411.1)TECHNICAL■ TECHNICAL (1979.7)
F4
Z: (04) 2172 ■ T: (01) 2396 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1573.0)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1635.0)PRESS■, PRESS (1578.6)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (2301.5)PRESS■, PRESS (2302.2)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (2308.5)
F1
Z: (06) 2049 ■ T: (04) 2235 ■
COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1509.7)COORDINATION■ COORDINATION (2052.1)
F2
Z: (03) 2283 ■ T: (01) 2403 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1656.4)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1653.8)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (2335.6)COMPRESSION■ COMPRESSION (2335.4)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2235 | 2 2403 | 3 2139 | 4 2396 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 N GROSSMAN USA ▬ | 2122 | 5Z 7T ▼ 43 Elo | 5Z ▼ 32 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 21 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 26 Elo | 82.2 | 2042 |
| 2 N MEIGNAN FRA ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1983 | 2Z 2T ▲ 14 Elo | 6Z 6T ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z ▼ 32 Elo | 2Z ▲ 0 Elo | 68.7 | 1969 |
| 3 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2007 | 3Z 6T ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 38 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 13 Elo | 1Z ▲ 1 Elo | 59.1 | 1969 |
| 4 A MATSUFUJI JPN ▬ | 1930 | 6Z 7T ▼ 19 Elo | 5Z ▲ 0 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 5 Elo | - ▼ 35 Elo | 58.1 | 1885 |
| 5 Z AVEZOU FRA Top 10 ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1756 | 7Z ▼ 9 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 34 Elo | - ▼ 16 Elo | 34.2 | 1757 |
| 6 M NAKAMURA JPN ▬ | 1962 | 2Z ▼ 20 Elo | - ▼ 26 Elo | 3Z ▼ 28 Elo | 3Z ▲ 5 Elo | 29.5 | 1895 |