Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S3
Z: (14) 2064 ■ T: (09) 2237 ■
FINGERS■, FINGERS (1557.6)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1549.9)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1947.8)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (1945.6)
S2
Z: (11) 2231 ■ T: (09) 2269 ■
FINGERS■, FINGERS (1726.8)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1734.5)PRESS■, PRESS (1746.6)PRESS■, PRESS (1954.6)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1948.8)TECHNICAL■ TECHNICAL (1948.9)
S4
Z: (16) 2132 ■ T: (04) 2391 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1633.6)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1627.4)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (2184.1)COORDINATION■ COORDINATION (2178.3)
S1
Z: (18) 1930 ■ T: (15) 2061 ■
FINGERS■, FINGERS (1430.6)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1418.0)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1706.4)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (1705.8)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2061 | 2 2269 | 3 2237 | 4 2391 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 S ANRAKU JPN Top 10 ▲ 2 better than predicted | 2067 | 2Z 5T ▼ 25 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 15 Elo | 1Z 4T ▲ 7 Elo | 3Z 4T ▼ 4 Elo | 98.5 | 2060 |
| 2 T NARASAKI JPN Top 10 ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1999 | 2Z 4T ▼ 4 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 8 Elo | 3Z 5T ▼ 4 Elo | 2Z 4T ▲ 12 Elo | 98.2 | 2011 |
| 3 D LEE KOR Top 10 ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1781 | 1Z 1T ▲ 33 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 35 Elo | 2Z 4T ▲ 23 Elo | 3Z ▼ 7 Elo | 84.4 | 1865 |
| 4 T ROBERTS GBR ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1959 | 1Z 1T ▲ 24 Elo | 3Z 4T ▲ 2 Elo | 2Z 4T ▲ 7 Elo | 7Z ▼ 45 Elo | 83.3 | 1947 |
| 5 M CORNU FRA ▲ 11 better than predicted | 1847 | 1Z 1T ▲ 29 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 19 Elo | - ▼ 51 Elo | 3Z 4T ▲ 23 Elo | 74.1 | 1871 |
| 6 A ONDRA CZE at home ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1933 | 1Z 2T ▲ 18 Elo | 2Z 4T ▲ 9 Elo | - ▼ 51 Elo | 4Z 5T ▲ 10 Elo | 73.8 | 1923 |
| 7 M MILNE GBR ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1776 | 2Z ▼ 18 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 34 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 35 Elo | 2Z ▲ 6 Elo | 69.7 | 1833 |
| 8 A SHAHAR USA ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1817 | 1Z 1T ▲ 44 Elo | 4Z ▼ 24 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 52 Elo | 7Z ▼ 30 Elo | 69.1 | 1859 |
| 9 S RICHARD FRA Top 10 ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1825 | 1Z 1T ▲ 42 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 25 Elo | 3Z ▼ 15 Elo | 4Z ▼ 11 Elo | 69.1 | 1866 |
| 10 M SCHALCK FRA Top 10 ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1890 | 1Z 4T ▲ 5 Elo | - ▼ 57 Elo | 4Z 4T ▲ 15 Elo | 7Z ▼ 16 Elo | 58.4 | 1842 |
| 11 R KAYOTANI JPN ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1846 | 1Z 1T ▲ 24 Elo | 7Z ▼ 19 Elo | 1Z ▼ 3 Elo | 3Z ▲ 3 Elo | 54.1 | 1851 |
| 12 S AVEZOU FRA ▬ | 1857 | 1Z 1T ▲ 25 Elo | - ▼ 48 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 30 Elo | - ▼ 35 Elo | 49.9 | 1836 |
| 13 J CHON KOR ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1875 | 1Z 2T ▲ 17 Elo | - ▼ 39 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 28 Elo | - ▼ 34 Elo | 49.8 | 1854 |
| 14 M NARASAKI JPN ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1940 | 2Z 2T ▼ 1 Elo | - ▼ 48 Elo | 1Z ▼ 4 Elo | 7Z ▼ 14 Elo | 43.9 | 1877 |
| 15 A PEHARC SLO ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1854 | 3Z 3T ▼ 7 Elo | - ▼ 28 Elo | 3Z ▼ 10 Elo | 7Z ▼ 3 Elo | 43.4 | 1808 |
| 16 Y FUJIWAKI JPN ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1875 | - ▼ 96 Elo | 7Z 7T ▲ 19 Elo | - ▼ 42 Elo | 7Z ▲ 1 Elo | 33.0 | 1768 |
| 17 N UZNIK AUT ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1803 | 1Z ▼ 6 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | 3Z ▲ 2 Elo | 7Z ▲ 1 Elo | 29.1 | 1781 |
| 18 N SARTIRANA ITA ▬ | 1815 | 1Z 2T ▲ 23 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | - ▼ 30 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | 24.9 | 1769 |
| 19 M KLEESATTEL GER ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1810 | 4Z ▼ 36 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | - ▼ 30 Elo | 7Z ▲ 5 Elo | 18.7 | 1736 |
| 20 R LEVIN ISR ▬ | 1659 | - ▼ 37 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | 0.0 | 1602 |
