Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S2
Z: (18) 1975 ■ T: (01) 2415 ■
COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1469.3)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1475.1)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1467.9)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (2262.1)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (2260.3)DELICATE■ DELICATE (2262.4)
S4
Z: (10) 2229 ■ T: (07) 2269 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1744.2)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1734.0)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1982.5)SLOPER■ SLOPER (1976.9)
S3
Z: (11) 2176 ■ T: (01) 2416 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1697.1)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1695.1)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (2263.3)COORDINATION■ COORDINATION (2261.6)
S1
Z: (19) 1780 ■ T: (08) 2206 ■
PRESS■, PRESS (1293.9)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1289.2)PRESS■, PRESS (1917.8)TECHNICAL■ TECHNICAL (1914.2)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2206 | 2 2415 | 3 2176 | 4 2269 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 S ANRAKU JPN Top 10 ▬ | 1996 | 1Z 3T ▲ 10 Elo | 2Z 4T ▲ 4 Elo | 3Z 4T ▲ 5 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 1 Elo | 98.5 | 2016 |
| 2 M NARASAKI JPN ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1932 | 1Z 3T ▲ 13 Elo | 2Z ▼ 13 Elo | 4Z ▼ 17 Elo | 4Z 4T ▲ 5 Elo | 68.8 | 1920 |
| 3 T ROBERTS GBR ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1933 | 1Z 1T ▲ 24 Elo | 7Z ▼ 56 Elo | 2Z ▼ 5 Elo | 3Z 4T ▲ 13 Elo | 68.4 | 1909 |
| 4 S AMAGASA JPN ▬ | 1892 | 2Z ▼ 29 Elo | 2Z ▼ 2 Elo | 3Z ▼ 4 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 20 Elo | 54.2 | 1877 |
| 5 E A.KRÜGER GER ▲ 9 better than predicted | 1748 | 1Z 1T ▲ 31 Elo | 4Z ▼ 4 Elo | 3Z ▲ 5 Elo | 6Z ▼ 10 Elo | 54.0 | 1770 |
| 5 R KAYOTANI JPN ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1821 | 1Z 2T ▲ 24 Elo | 5Z ▼ 16 Elo | 2Z ▲ 3 Elo | 5Z ▼ 14 Elo | 54.0 | 1818 |
| 7 A INTRACHUPO. THA ▲ 12 better than predicted | 1705 | 3Z ▼ 8 Elo | 1Z ▲ 14 Elo | 6Z ▲ 2 Elo | 5Z 5T ▲ 22 Elo | 53.5 | 1735 |
| 7 T NARASAKI JPN Top 10 ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1960 | 1Z ▼ 25 Elo | 2Z ▼ 8 Elo | 5Z ▼ 23 Elo | 6Z 6T ▼ 11 Elo | 53.5 | 1893 |
| 9 Y FUJIWAKI JPN ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1813 | 1Z ▲ 1 Elo | 2Z ▲ 2 Elo | - ▼ 31 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 34 Elo | 44.9 | 1822 |
| 10 S YOSHIDA JPN ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1798 | 1Z 3T ▲ 24 Elo | 3Z ▼ 5 Elo | - ▼ 28 Elo | 2Z ▼ 5 Elo | 44.5 | 1787 |
| 11 A PEHARC SLO ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1828 | 3Z 3T ▲ 3 Elo | 2Z ▲ 1 Elo | 4Z ▲ 0 Elo | - ▼ 39 Elo | 44.2 | 1797 |
| 12 G VEZONIK SLO ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1881 | 2Z 2T ▲ 10 Elo | 2Z ▼ 3 Elo | - ▼ 36 Elo | - ▼ 45 Elo | 34.7 | 1814 |
| 13 T LEMAGNER FRA ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1919 | 1Z ▼ 17 Elo | 1Z ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z ▲ 12 Elo | - ▼ 74 Elo | 30.0 | 1849 |
| 14 C DUFFY USA ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1932 | 1Z ▼ 11 Elo | 3Z ▼ 17 Elo | 3Z ▼ 2 Elo | - ▼ 42 Elo | 29.6 | 1863 |
| 15 D AKHTAR GBR ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1703 | 1Z ▲ 7 Elo | 1Z ▲ 13 Elo | - ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 14 Elo | 20.0 | 1695 |
| 16 S RICHARD FRA Top 10 ▼ 8 worse than predicted | 1779 | 3Z ▼ 24 Elo | 2Z ▲ 10 Elo | - ▼ 28 Elo | - ▼ 24 Elo | 19.7 | 1718 |
| 17 G P.FRANGANI. ESP ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1727 | 3Z ▼ 11 Elo | 3Z ▲ 2 Elo | - ▼ 13 Elo | - ▼ 13 Elo | 19.6 | 1694 |
| 18 J HU CHN ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1783 | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 7Z ▼ 35 Elo | - ▼ 22 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | 19.2 | 1712 |
| 19 Y CHON KOR ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1772 | 2Z ▼ 9 Elo | - ▼ 53 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | - ▼ 17 Elo | 9.9 | 1684 |