Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F2
Z: (06) 1910 ■ T: (03) 2132 ■
COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1482.3)PRESS■, PRESS (1465.6)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1497.1)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1947.2)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1942.9)PRESS■ PRESS (1940.0)
F3
Z: (06) 1770 ■ T: (04) 1993 ■
POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1416.3)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (1854.8)
F4
Z: (04) 2112 ■ T: (02) 2191 ■
TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1621.4)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1611.3)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (2110.6)TECHNICAL■ TECHNICAL (2111.2)
F1
Z: (06) 1755 ■ T: (06) 1805 ■
POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1396.0)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (1670.5)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1805 | 2 2132 | 3 1993 | 4 2191 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1943 | 1Z 2T ▲ 1 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z ▼ 36 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 21 Elo | 84.5 | 1929 |
| 2 N GROSSMAN USA at home ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2022 | 1Z 1T ▲ 10 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 15 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 12 Elo | 7Z ▼ 92 Elo | 84.4 | 1967 |
| 3 N MEIGNAN FRA ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1853 | 1Z 1T ▲ 18 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 17 Elo | 7Z ▼ 34 Elo | 83.8 | 1847 |
| 4 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1891 | 1Z 1T ▲ 15 Elo | 3Z ▼ 52 Elo | 2Z ▼ 32 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 33 Elo | 69.7 | 1855 |
| 5 B RABOUTOU USA at home ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1853 | 1Z 1T ▲ 17 Elo | 5Z ▼ 49 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 25 Elo | - ▼ 47 Elo | 59.6 | 1803 |
| 5 M NAKAMURA JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1766 | 1Z 3T ▲ 4 Elo | 3Z ▼ 13 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 27 Elo | - ▼ 30 Elo | 59.6 | 1756 |