Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S2
Z: (18) 1951 ■ T: (03) 2300 ■
COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1518.5)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1521.4)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1537.6)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1545.6)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (2102.4)SLOPER■, SLOPER (2100.0)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2110.9)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (2113.3)
S1
Z: (19) 1815 ■ T: (14) 2045 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1359.1)DELICATE■ DELICATE (1699.0)
S4
Z: (20) 1837 ■ T: (14) 2074 ■
COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1461.5)PRESS■, PRESS (1454.5)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1430.4)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1752.8)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1777.1)PRESS■ PRESS (1763.5)
S3
Z: (07) 2190 ■ T: (02) 2300 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1783.2)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1745.2)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1775.1)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2147.7)SLOPER■, SLOPER (2141.1)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (2149.8)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1815 | 2 1951 | 3 2300 | 4 2074 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 J SCHUBERT AUT ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1801 | 1Z 4T ▲ 10 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 28 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 34 Elo | 1Z ▼ 36 Elo | 84.6 | 1837 |
| 2 J POSCH AUT ▲ 15 better than predicted | 1797 | 1Z 1T ▲ 25 Elo | 3Z ▼ 19 Elo | 2Z ▲ 5 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 17 Elo | 69.5 | 1825 |
| 3 M NARASAKI JPN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1882 | 2Z 2T ▲ 2 Elo | 6Z ▼ 49 Elo | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 13 Elo | 69.1 | 1852 |
| 4 Y FLOHÉ GER ▲ 10 better than predicted | 1924 | 5Z ▼ 84 Elo | 3Z ▼ 17 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 34 Elo | 2Z 4T ▼ 4 Elo | 69.0 | 1853 |
| 4 S ANRAKU JPN Top 10 ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1901 | 1Z 2T ▲ 15 Elo | 3Z ▼ 26 Elo | 3Z ▼ 13 Elo | 2Z 5T ▼ 12 Elo | 69.0 | 1865 |
| 6 C DUFFY USA at home ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1812 | - ▼ 69 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 34 Elo | 3Z ▲ 4 Elo | 2Z 5T ▲ 0 Elo | 59.3 | 1786 |
| 7 S AMAGASA JPN ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1854 | 7Z ▼ 68 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 32 Elo | - ▼ 36 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 10 Elo | 59.1 | 1796 |
| 7 O BAUDRAND CAN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1768 | 1Z 1T ▲ 32 Elo | 3Z ▼ 6 Elo | - ▼ 28 Elo | 2Z 7T ▼ 5 Elo | 59.1 | 1763 |
| 9 N RUSEV BUL ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1715 | 1Z 2T ▲ 30 Elo | 3Z ▲ 0 Elo | - ▼ 15 Elo | 2Z 7T ▲ 1 Elo | 59.0 | 1733 |
| 9 M CORNU FRA ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1740 | 1Z 3T ▲ 25 Elo | 3Z ▼ 3 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | 2Z 6T ▲ 2 Elo | 59.0 | 1745 |
| 11 T NARASAKI JPN Top 10 ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 1945 | 4Z 5T ▼ 26 Elo | 4Z ▼ 35 Elo | - ▼ 41 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 7 Elo | 58.8 | 1855 |
| 11 S KIROV BUL ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1754 | 1Z 6T ▲ 12 Elo | 2Z ▲ 2 Elo | - ▼ 15 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 7 Elo | 58.8 | 1748 |
| 13 T ROBERTS GBR ▼ 8 worse than predicted | 1837 | 1Z 2T ▲ 22 Elo | 7Z ▼ 43 Elo | - ▼ 36 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 22 Elo | 58.7 | 1805 |
| 14 Y FUJIWAKI JPN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1671 | 1Z 7T ▲ 16 Elo | 5Z ▲ 1 Elo | 3Z ▲ 14 Elo | 5Z ▼ 28 Elo | 53.4 | 1674 |
| 15 T LEMAGNER FRA ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 1803 | 2Z 2T ▲ 24 Elo | - ▼ 71 Elo | - ▼ 28 Elo | 6Z 6T ▼ 24 Elo | 48.8 | 1712 |
| 16 B HANNA USA at home ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1804 | 3Z ▼ 38 Elo | 1Z ▲ 9 Elo | - ▼ 13 Elo | 1Z 6T ▲ 11 Elo | 44.3 | 1774 |
| 17 T ROMŠAK SLO ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1640 | 2Z 2T ▲ 26 Elo | 2Z ▲ 12 Elo | - ▼ 9 Elo | 7Z ▼ 27 Elo | 44.1 | 1643 |
| 17 Y OGATA JPN ▼ 8 worse than predicted | 1843 | 1Z 7T ▼ 5 Elo | 3Z ▼ 10 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | 2Z ▼ 25 Elo | 44.1 | 1784 |
| 19 B VARGAS CHI ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1612 | 3Z ▼ 4 Elo | 6Z ▲ 3 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | 6Z ▼ 11 Elo | 28.8 | 1593 |
| 20 D AKHTAR GBR ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 1552 | 2Z ▲ 6 Elo | - ▼ 15 Elo | - ▼ 5 Elo | 4Z ▲ 2 Elo | 19.6 | 1543 |