Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S2
Z: (11) 1968 ■ T: (00) 2168 ■
POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1703.0)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1669.2)PINCH■, PINCH (1665.3)PINCH■, PINCH (1986.5)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2008.2)COMPRESSION■ COMPRESSION (1986.9)
S3
Z: (16) 1709 ■ T: (03) 2044 ■
SLOPER■, SLOPER (1458.2)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1472.1)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1821.6)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (1848.5)
S4
Z: (16) 1740 ■ T: (04) 2036 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1537.6)DELICATE■ DELICATE (1818.3)
S1
Z: (10) 2119 ■ T: (06) 2174 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1767.5)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1726.1)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1838.0)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (1873.3)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2174 | 2 2168 | 3 1709 | 4 2036 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 J GARNBRET SLO Top 10 ▬ | 2092 | 5Z 5T ▼ 127 Elo | 1Z ▼ 56 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | 84.2 | 1925 |
| 2 Z AVEZOU FRA Top 10 ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1813 | 2Z 3T ▼ 13 Elo | 1Z ▼ 21 Elo | 1Z ▼ 24 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 4 Elo | 69.6 | 1759 |
| 3 A MATSUFUJI JPN ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1751 | 7Z 7T ▼ 63 Elo | 4Z ▼ 40 Elo | - ▼ 105 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 24 Elo | 58.5 | 1576 |
| 4 E MCNEICE GBR Top 10 ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1696 | 3Z 4T ▼ 3 Elo | 2Z ▼ 16 Elo | 1Z ▼ 19 Elo | 1Z ▼ 23 Elo | 54.4 | 1635 |
| 5 Z LUO CHN at home ▲ 8 better than predicted | 1886 | 4Z 4T ▼ 45 Elo | 3Z ▼ 50 Elo | 1Z ▼ 18 Elo | 2Z ▼ 48 Elo | 54.1 | 1725 |
| 6 C MORONI ITA ▲ 12 better than predicted | 1767 | - ▼ 87 Elo | 1Z ▼ 2 Elo | 1Z ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 19 Elo | 45.0 | 1696 |
| 7 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1953 | 3Z ▼ 49 Elo | 2Z ▼ 24 Elo | 1Z ▼ 32 Elo | 1Z ▼ 33 Elo | 39.7 | 1815 |
| 8 M NAKAMURA JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1707 | 7Z ▼ 22 Elo | 2Z ▼ 4 Elo | 1Z ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z ▼ 15 Elo | 39.2 | 1659 |
| 8 F ITO JPN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1863 | 7Z ▼ 53 Elo | 1Z ▼ 5 Elo | 1Z ▼ 19 Elo | 2Z ▼ 40 Elo | 39.2 | 1746 |
| 10 M RICHARDSON CAN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1853 | - ▼ 98 Elo | - ▼ 93 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 23 Elo | 1Z ▼ 30 Elo | 35.0 | 1671 |
| 11 C CAULIER BEL ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1678 | - ▼ 43 Elo | - ▼ 46 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 13 Elo | 1Z ▼ 2 Elo | 34.8 | 1608 |
| 12 S GEJO SRB ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1809 | 1Z 4T ▲ 12 Elo | - ▼ 86 Elo | - ▼ 90 Elo | 5Z ▼ 73 Elo | 34.3 | 1591 |
| 13 M NONAKA JPN ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 1977 | 6Z ▼ 69 Elo | 1Z ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z ▼ 20 Elo | - ▼ 110 Elo | 29.5 | 1786 |
| 14 C SEO KOR ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1772 | - ▼ 38 Elo | - ▼ 55 Elo | 1Z ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z ▼ 4 Elo | 20.0 | 1676 |
| 15 H MEUL GER ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1746 | - ▼ 31 Elo | - ▼ 38 Elo | 1Z ▼ 4 Elo | 2Z ▼ 16 Elo | 19.9 | 1663 |
| 16 A APEL GER ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1479 | - ▼ 7 Elo | - ▼ 13 Elo | 2Z ▲ 3 Elo | 2Z ▲ 7 Elo | 19.8 | 1471 |
| 17 J PILZ AUT ▼ 8 worse than predicted | 1672 | - ▼ 18 Elo | 4Z ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z ▲ 0 Elo | - ▼ 80 Elo | 19.7 | 1585 |
| 17 M ISHII JPN ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1615 | - ▼ 22 Elo | - ▼ 32 Elo | 4Z ▼ 31 Elo | 1Z ▲ 9 Elo | 19.7 | 1544 |
| 19 K CONDIE USA ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1690 | - ▼ 19 Elo | - ▼ 29 Elo | - ▼ 68 Elo | - ▼ 50 Elo | 0.0 | 1540 |
| 19 M KRAMPL SLO ▬ | 1511 | - ▼ 7 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | - ▼ 47 Elo | - ▼ 28 Elo | 0.0 | 1428 |