Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S4
Z: (20) 1677 ■ T: (15) 1911 ■
S1
Z: (20) 1408 ■ T: (17) 1710 ■
S3
Z: (17) 1970 ■ T: (13) 2041 ■
S2
Z: (12) 1986 ■ T: (03) 2147 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1710 | 2 2147 | 3 1970 | 4 1677 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 J GARNBRET SLO Top 10 ▬ | 2175 | 1Z 1T ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 1 Elo | 100.0 | 2178 |
| 2 B RABOUTOU USA ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1817 | 1Z 1T ▲ 5 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 14 Elo | 3Z 6T ▼ 93 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | 99.3 | 1751 |
| 3 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▬ | 1911 | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z ▼ 59 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 22 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 5 Elo | 84.8 | 1838 |
| 4 N GROSSMAN USA ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1891 | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | 2Z ▼ 62 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 20 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 6 Elo | 84.7 | 1818 |
| 5 A MORI JPN ▲ 10 better than predicted | 1814 | 1Z 1T ▲ 5 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 5 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 42 Elo | 2Z ▼ 109 Elo | 84.3 | 1663 |
| 6 Z AVEZOU FRA Top 10 ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1808 | 1Z 1T ▲ 5 Elo | 1Z ▼ 18 Elo | 5Z 5T ▼ 76 Elo | 1Z 3T ▼ 12 Elo | 84.0 | 1707 |
| 7 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1862 | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | 3Z ▼ 56 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 100 Elo | 2Z 3T ▼ 23 Elo | 83.1 | 1686 |
| 8 J PILZ AUT ▬ | 1741 | 1Z 1T ▲ 7 Elo | 2Z ▼ 24 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 57 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 15 Elo | 82.4 | 1682 |
| 9 F COHAUT FRA ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1742 | 2Z 2T ▼ 25 Elo | - ▼ 67 Elo | 1Z 6T ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 14 Elo | 74.3 | 1675 |
| 10 A KEREM ISR ▬ | 1738 | 1Z 1T ▲ 7 Elo | - ▼ 76 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 35 Elo | 5Z 5T ▼ 65 Elo | 72.8 | 1577 |
| 11 J KRUDER SLO ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1799 | 1Z 1T ▲ 6 Elo | 4Z ▼ 50 Elo | 6Z ▼ 65 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 15 Elo | 69.2 | 1705 |
| 12 M BURŠÍKOVÁ SVK ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1716 | 1Z ▼ 80 Elo | - ▼ 56 Elo | 2Z 7T ▲ 19 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 28 Elo | 59.3 | 1633 |
| 13 P KLINGLER SUI at home ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1776 | 1Z 1T ▲ 7 Elo | - ▼ 61 Elo | 2Z ▼ 21 Elo | 1Z 7T ▼ 47 Elo | 59.2 | 1661 |
| 14 K CONDIE USA ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1689 | 1Z ▼ 67 Elo | - ▼ 23 Elo | 4Z 7T ▲ 11 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 10 Elo | 58.6 | 1622 |
| 15 A SANDERS USA Top 10 ▼ 10 worse than predicted | 1855 | 1Z 1T ▲ 4 Elo | 6Z ▼ 54 Elo | - ▼ 93 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 104 Elo | 57.8 | 1615 |
| 16 E REKABI IRI ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1758 | 1Z 1T ▲ 9 Elo | 1Z ▲ 0 Elo | 7Z ▼ 45 Elo | 7Z ▼ 110 Elo | 53.3 | 1612 |
| 17 F STERRER AUT ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1751 | 1Z 1T ▲ 9 Elo | - ▼ 41 Elo | - ▼ 61 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 4 Elo | 49.8 | 1671 |
| 18 M THOMPSON-S. GBR ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1649 | 1Z 1T ▲ 13 Elo | 1Z ▲ 12 Elo | - ▼ 40 Elo | 7Z ▼ 68 Elo | 44.1 | 1569 |
| 19 A HÖNIG GER ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1771 | 1Z 3T ▼ 18 Elo | - ▼ 39 Elo | 7Z ▼ 24 Elo | 2Z ▼ 39 Elo | 43.5 | 1655 |
| 20 I KAZBEKOVA UKR ▼ 13 worse than predicted | 1865 | 1Z ▼ 70 Elo | - ▼ 37 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 10 Elo | 1Z ▼ 34 Elo | 43.2 | 1719 |