Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S2
Z: (13) 2289 ■ T: (03) 2521 ■
TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1626.1)TECHNICAL■ TECHNICAL (2336.7)
S1
Z: (11) 2338 ■ T: (05) 2491 ■
PINCH■, PINCH (1664.9)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1704.0)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1670.3)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (2229.3)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2235.0)PINCH■ PINCH (2226.5)
S4
Z: (12) 2350 ■ T: (08) 2418 ■
MANTLE■, MANTLE (1686.9)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1716.3)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1690.9)SLOPER■, SLOPER (2092.5)MANTLE■, MANTLE (2091.9)DELICATE■ DELICATE (2096.2)
S3
Z: (17) 2273 ■ T: (16) 2297 ■
COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1595.9)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1631.8)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1759.3)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (1782.0)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2491 | 2 2289 | 3 2297 | 4 2350 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 B RABOUTOU USA ▲ 5 better than predicted | 2005 | 2Z 2T ▲ 29 Elo | 6Z 6T ▲ 6 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 4 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 6 Elo | 97.0 | 2038 |
| 2 F ITO JPN ▲ 11 better than predicted | 1972 | 2Z 2T ▲ 30 Elo | 1Z ▲ 8 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 18 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 26 Elo | 84.4 | 2054 |
| 3 J GARNBRET SLO Top 10 ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 2176 | 1Z 1T ▲ 13 Elo | 3Z 6T ▼ 5 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 1 Elo | 6Z ▼ 28 Elo | 83.6 | 2155 |
| 4 M NONAKA JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2041 | 2Z 2T ▲ 26 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 30 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 6 Elo | 7Z ▼ 38 Elo | 83.5 | 2053 |
| 5 N GROSSMAN USA ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 2155 | 4Z 4T ▼ 4 Elo | 5Z ▼ 21 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 14 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 16 Elo | 83.4 | 2132 |
| 6 A MORI JPN ▲ 12 better than predicted | 1806 | - ▼ 16 Elo | 1Z ▲ 16 Elo | 4Z 4T ▲ 23 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 37 Elo | 59.4 | 1867 |
| 7 Z AVEZOU FRA Top 10 ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1900 | - ▼ 25 Elo | 2Z ▲ 12 Elo | 4Z 4T ▲ 13 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 36 Elo | 59.3 | 1938 |
| 8 I KAZBEKOVA UKR ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1983 | - ▼ 34 Elo | 3Z ▲ 3 Elo | 5Z 5T ▼ 5 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 24 Elo | 58.6 | 1974 |
| 9 F GIBERT FRA ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 2016 | 7Z ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 7 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 7 Elo | 57.8 | 1998 |
| 10 A SANDERS USA Top 10 ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 2072 | - ▼ 61 Elo | 1Z ▲ 11 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 45 Elo | 2Z 5T ▲ 28 Elo | 57.5 | 2009 |
| 11 J PILZ AUT at home ▬ | 1997 | - ▼ 28 Elo | 5Z ▼ 11 Elo | 4Z 4T ▲ 7 Elo | 2Z ▼ 5 Elo | 43.9 | 1963 |
| 12 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 ▼ 8 worse than predicted | 2102 | 4Z ▲ 2 Elo | 3Z ▼ 2 Elo | 5Z 5T ▼ 26 Elo | - ▼ 64 Elo | 43.7 | 2017 |
| 13 M BURŠÍKOVÁ SVK ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1797 | 5Z ▲ 19 Elo | - ▼ 25 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 49 Elo | - ▼ 29 Elo | 34.4 | 1816 |
| 14 S GEJO SRB ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 2107 | 1Z ▼ 2 Elo | - ▼ 50 Elo | 5Z 7T ▼ 33 Elo | - ▼ 40 Elo | 34.0 | 1991 |
| 15 M AOYAGI JPN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1937 | 2Z ▲ 10 Elo | - ▼ 32 Elo | 6Z 6T ▼ 3 Elo | - ▼ 26 Elo | 33.9 | 1891 |
| 16 C MORONI ITA ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2034 | - ▼ 35 Elo | - ▼ 31 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 16 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | 23.6 | 1933 |
| 17 L ROGORA ITA ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1847 | - ▼ 12 Elo | 1Z ▲ 15 Elo | - ▼ 32 Elo | 3Z ▲ 11 Elo | 19.8 | 1833 |
| 18 C SEO KOR ▼ 10 worse than predicted | 2120 | - ▼ 25 Elo | 2Z ▲ 3 Elo | - ▼ 75 Elo | - ▼ 36 Elo | 9.9 | 1997 |
| 19 S E.MIMOUNE FRA Top 10 ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 2080 | 3Z ▼ 4 Elo | - ▼ 43 Elo | - ▼ 53 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | 9.8 | 1962 |
| 20 A HÖNIG GER ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1962 | - ▼ 20 Elo | - ▼ 19 Elo | 7Z ▼ 10 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | 9.4 | 1900 |