Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S2
Z: (20) 1863 ■ T: (13) 2147 ■
PRESS■, PRESS (1276.3)PRESS■ PRESS (1791.5)
S3
Z: (19) 1881 ■ T: (03) 2440 ■
POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1328.6)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1325.8)PINCH■, PINCH (1319.6)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2275.0)FINGERS■, FINGERS (2274.0)PINCH■ PINCH (2272.5)
S4
Z: (20) 1882 ■ T: (03) 2444 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1325.7)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1322.4)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2271.5)DELICATE■ DELICATE (2269.8)
S1
Z: (20) 1959 ■ T: (14) 2178 ■
COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1361.2)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1381.9)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1776.2)COMPRESSION■ COMPRESSION (1764.5)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2178 | 2 2147 | 3 2440 | 4 1882 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 N GROSSMAN USA ▬ | 2124 | 2Z 3T ▼ 6 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 9 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 9 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 11 Elo | 99.5 | 2147 |
| 2 C SEO KOR ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1962 | 2Z 2T ▲ 15 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 21 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 27 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 22 Elo | 99.4 | 2047 |
| 3 S GEJO SRB ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1986 | 1Z 2T ▲ 19 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 18 Elo | 1Z ▼ 3 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 25 Elo | 84.7 | 2045 |
| 4 A KEREM ISR ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1912 | 5Z 6T ▼ 14 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 29 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 29 Elo | 1Z ▲ 5 Elo | 84.0 | 1961 |
| 5 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 2082 | 1Z 1T ▲ 20 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 9 Elo | 1Z ▼ 5 Elo | 1Z ▼ 7 Elo | 70.0 | 2099 |
| 6 R NAKAGAWA JPN ▲ 11 better than predicted | 1785 | 1Z 2T ▲ 30 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 30 Elo | 1Z ▲ 9 Elo | 1Z ▲ 7 Elo | 69.9 | 1861 |
| 6 J FÄRBER AUT ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1958 | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 23 Elo | 1Z ▼ 3 Elo | 2Z ▼ 12 Elo | 69.9 | 1992 |
| 8 H MEUL GER ▬ | 1901 | 1Z 1T ▲ 27 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 11 Elo | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z ▼ 1 Elo | 69.8 | 1942 |
| 8 J KRUDER SLO ▬ | 1935 | 1Z 1T ▲ 24 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 9 Elo | 1Z ▲ 1 Elo | 1Z ▼ 1 Elo | 69.8 | 1968 |
| 10 S HOPFENSITZ GER ▲ 10 better than predicted | 1496 | 3Z 3T ▲ 34 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 34 Elo | 2Z ▲ 15 Elo | 7Z ▲ 4 Elo | 68.6 | 1583 |
| 11 M SEKIKAWA JPN Top 10 ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 2001 | 1Z ▼ 37 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 31 Elo | 2Z ▼ 15 Elo | 1Z ▲ 2 Elo | 54.9 | 1982 |
| 12 P KLINGLER SUI ▬ | 1947 | 1Z 1T ▲ 22 Elo | 1Z ▼ 14 Elo | 1Z ▲ 0 Elo | 3Z ▼ 20 Elo | 54.8 | 1935 |
| 12 K CONDIE USA ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1880 | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | 2Z ▼ 30 Elo | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | 2Z ▼ 4 Elo | 54.8 | 1878 |
| 14 F COHAUT FRA ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1932 | 2Z 3T ▲ 11 Elo | 3Z ▼ 51 Elo | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | 1Z ▲ 7 Elo | 54.5 | 1905 |
| 14 L RAKOVEC SLO ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1720 | 3Z 3T ▲ 24 Elo | 1Z ▲ 1 Elo | 2Z ▲ 6 Elo | 1Z ▲ 11 Elo | 54.5 | 1762 |
| 16 Z LUO CHN ▼ 13 worse than predicted | 1970 | 3Z ▼ 58 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 18 Elo | 1Z ▲ 3 Elo | 4Z ▼ 23 Elo | 54.4 | 1910 |
| 17 A SANDERS USA Top 10 ▼ 13 worse than predicted | 1971 | 7Z ▼ 107 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 31 Elo | 2Z ▼ 9 Elo | 1Z ▲ 14 Elo | 53.8 | 1900 |
| 18 M RICHARDSON CAN ▼ 8 worse than predicted | 1975 | 1Z ▼ 19 Elo | 3Z ▼ 47 Elo | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 2Z ▼ 7 Elo | 39.7 | 1906 |
| 19 A MATSUFUJI JPN ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1898 | 4Z ▼ 33 Elo | 2Z ▼ 12 Elo | 1Z ▲ 7 Elo | 2Z ▼ 1 Elo | 39.5 | 1859 |
| 20 M FOGU ITA at home ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1655 | 3Z ▲ 5 Elo | 2Z ▲ 5 Elo | - ▼ 34 Elo | 3Z ▲ 8 Elo | 29.5 | 1643 |