Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S1
Z: (20) 1843 ■ T: (07) 2305 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1287.0)DELICATE■ DELICATE (2023.3)
S2
Z: (16) 2139 ■ T: (06) 2360 ■
S3
Z: (18) 2008 ■ T: (11) 2190 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1491.0)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1491.1)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1842.4)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (1844.5)
S4
Z: (05) 2339 ■ T: (02) 2426 ■
POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1765.1)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1757.7)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2275.0)SLOPER■ SLOPER (2273.6)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1843 | 2 2139 | 3 2008 | 4 2426 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 J GARNBRET SLO Top 10 ▬ | 2020 | 1Z 2T ▲ 20 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 21 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 21 Elo | 99.8 | 2108 |
| 2 F ITO JPN ▲ 9 better than predicted | 1945 | 2Z 4T ▲ 10 Elo | 5Z 5T ▼ 8 Elo | 1Z ▼ 12 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 36 Elo | 83.8 | 1971 |
| 3 F COHAUT FRA ▲ 14 better than predicted | 1769 | 1Z 2T ▲ 32 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 33 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 21 Elo | - ▼ 22 Elo | 74.5 | 1835 |
| 4 M NONAKA JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2021 | 1Z 1T ▲ 23 Elo | 3Z 6T ▼ 17 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 22 Elo | - ▼ 48 Elo | 74.3 | 2004 |
| 5 S GEJO SRB ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1972 | 2Z 4T ▲ 1 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 2 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 18 Elo | - ▼ 33 Elo | 73.9 | 1958 |
| 6 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 2048 | 1Z 1T ▲ 20 Elo | 3Z 4T ▼ 10 Elo | 1Z ▼ 30 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | 59.5 | 2004 |
| 7 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1965 | 1Z ▼ 10 Elo | 4Z ▼ 24 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | 2Z ▲ 8 Elo | 54.6 | 1965 |
| 8 C SEO KOR ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1862 | 3Z ▼ 21 Elo | 2Z ▼ 1 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 24 Elo | 2Z ▲ 11 Elo | 54.4 | 1875 |
| 9 J PILZ AUT ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1867 | 2Z ▼ 13 Elo | - ▼ 40 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 27 Elo | 2Z ▲ 13 Elo | 44.7 | 1858 |
| 10 J KRUDER SLO ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1744 | 1Z ▲ 5 Elo | 4Z ▲ 4 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 17 Elo | - ▼ 12 Elo | 44.3 | 1759 |
| 11 K DEBEVEC SLO ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1853 | 3Z ▼ 17 Elo | 3Z ▲ 0 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 6 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | 44.2 | 1832 |
| 12 G TESIO ITA ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1820 | 3Z 5T ▲ 10 Elo | 7Z ▼ 14 Elo | 1Z ▼ 8 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | 43.6 | 1798 |
| 13 J FÄRBER AUT ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1873 | 1Z ▼ 4 Elo | - ▼ 35 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 5 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | 34.4 | 1823 |
| 14 A KEREM ISR ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1807 | 6Z ▼ 27 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 15 Elo | - ▼ 7 Elo | 34.1 | 1765 |
| 15 S E.MIMOUNE FRA Top 10 ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1927 | 1Z ▼ 1 Elo | 4Z ▼ 10 Elo | 1Z ▼ 12 Elo | - ▼ 16 Elo | 29.7 | 1889 |
| 16 M AOYAGI JPN ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1903 | 1Z ▼ 4 Elo | 5Z ▼ 10 Elo | 2Z ▼ 21 Elo | - ▼ 16 Elo | 29.5 | 1854 |
| 17 N KURA JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1836 | 2Z ▼ 7 Elo | 4Z ▲ 1 Elo | 3Z ▼ 23 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | 29.4 | 1797 |
| 18 S YOKOYAMA SUI ▬ | 1779 | 1Z ▲ 8 Elo | 5Z ▲ 2 Elo | 5Z ▼ 26 Elo | - ▼ 7 Elo | 29.2 | 1757 |
| 19 A CLARK USA ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1780 | 2Z ▲ 0 Elo | 7Z ▼ 3 Elo | - ▼ 49 Elo | - ▼ 7 Elo | 19.1 | 1726 |
| 20 H JANICOT FRA ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1849 | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | - ▼ 45 Elo | - ▼ 70 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | 10.0 | 1744 |
