Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S1
Z: (08) 2323 ■ T: (06) 2356 ■
POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1795.6)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1778.4)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1780.9)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1767.7)SLOPER■, SLOPER (2036.7)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2047.2)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (2044.1)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (2046.3)
S3
Z: (17) 2092 ■ T: (06) 2324 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1574.1)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1562.8)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (2045.4)TECHNICAL■ TECHNICAL (2032.5)
S4
Z: (11) 2242 ■ T: (05) 2346 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1727.5)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1707.9)DELICATE■, DELICATE (2115.1)TECHNICAL■ TECHNICAL (2111.5)
S2
Z: (20) 1769 ■ T: (09) 2178 ■
COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1237.5)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1234.9)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1234.2)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1883.2)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1883.3)COMPRESSION■ COMPRESSION (1881.0)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2323 | 2 1769 | 3 2324 | 4 2346 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 D LEE KOR Top 10 ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1861 | 1Z 1T ▲ 34 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 28 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 28 Elo | 7Z ▼ 33 Elo | 83.9 | 1918 |
| 2 Y OGATA JPN ▬ | 1895 | 2Z 2T ▲ 26 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | - ▼ 52 Elo | 74.8 | 1925 |
| 3 M SCHALCK FRA Top 10 ▲ 9 better than predicted | 1848 | 2Z 2T ▲ 28 Elo | 1Z ▼ 5 Elo | 5Z ▼ 30 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 27 Elo | 69.0 | 1868 |
| 4 J POSCH AUT ▲ 15 better than predicted | 1849 | 1Z 3T ▲ 28 Elo | 4Z ▼ 34 Elo | 2Z 4T ▲ 19 Elo | 5Z ▼ 8 Elo | 68.7 | 1854 |
| 5 A ONDRA CZE at home ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1864 | - ▼ 45 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 18 Elo | 7Z ▼ 33 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 33 Elo | 58.6 | 1840 |
| 6 Y FLOHÉ GER ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1759 | 7Z ▼ 6 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 32 Elo | 7Z 7T ▲ 0 Elo | - ▼ 23 Elo | 57.8 | 1764 |
| 7 C DUFFY USA ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1836 | 1Z 4T ▲ 29 Elo | 1Z ▼ 9 Elo | 2Z ▼ 8 Elo | 7Z ▼ 5 Elo | 53.7 | 1843 |
| 8 M MAWEM FRA ▲ 10 better than predicted | 1906 | 3Z 4T ▲ 18 Elo | 1Z ▼ 7 Elo | 7Z ▼ 46 Elo | 4Z ▼ 1 Elo | 53.6 | 1870 |
| 9 T NARASAKI JPN Top 10 ▼ 8 worse than predicted | 2063 | 3Z ▼ 38 Elo | 1Z ▼ 26 Elo | 1Z ▼ 19 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 5 Elo | 52.0 | 1975 |
| 10 S ANRAKU JPN Top 10 ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 2064 | - ▼ 114 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 25 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 13 Elo | - ▼ 77 Elo | 49.6 | 1924 |
| 11 H V.DUYSEN BEL Top 10 ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1862 | - ▼ 24 Elo | 1Z ▼ 1 Elo | 1Z ▲ 5 Elo | 6Z 7T ▲ 17 Elo | 43.6 | 1861 |
| 12 S LORENZI BEL ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1857 | - ▼ 25 Elo | 2Z ▼ 15 Elo | 6Z ▼ 12 Elo | 6Z 6T ▲ 23 Elo | 43.4 | 1830 |
| 13 R KAYOTANI JPN ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1988 | - ▼ 74 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 24 Elo | 7Z ▼ 59 Elo | 7Z ▼ 13 Elo | 43.1 | 1871 |
| 14 Y PAN CHN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1769 | - ▼ 15 Elo | 1Z ▲ 1 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 36 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | 35.0 | 1775 |
| 15 J CHON KOR ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 1881 | - ▼ 22 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 22 Elo | 1Z ▲ 3 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | 34.9 | 1861 |
| 16 T ROBERTS GBR ▼ 13 worse than predicted | 1936 | - ▼ 31 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 24 Elo | 5Z ▼ 29 Elo | - ▼ 32 Elo | 34.6 | 1873 |
| 17 K FUJII JPN ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 1774 | - ▼ 12 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 24 Elo | - ▼ 32 Elo | - ▼ 13 Elo | 24.8 | 1746 |
| 18 J KRUDER SLO ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1783 | - ▼ 12 Elo | 1Z ▼ 1 Elo | 2Z ▲ 6 Elo | - ▼ 15 Elo | 19.9 | 1764 |
| 19 M MILNE GBR ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1887 | - ▼ 20 Elo | 2Z ▼ 23 Elo | - ▼ 39 Elo | 5Z ▲ 6 Elo | 19.5 | 1816 |
| 20 N MARCUS ISR ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1863 | - ▼ 17 Elo | 2Z ▼ 19 Elo | - ▼ 32 Elo | - ▼ 17 Elo | 9.9 | 1784 |