Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S1
Z: (20) 1902 ■ T: (18) 1988 ■
COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1459.6)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1443.0)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1596.3)COORDINATION■ COORDINATION (1598.9)
S4
Z: (21) 1729 ■ T: (09) 2172 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1302.5)DELICATE■ DELICATE (1882.0)
S2
Z: (22) 1764 ■ T: (01) 2330 ■
PINCH■, PINCH (1324.8)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1340.9)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1326.8)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2191.2)PINCH■, PINCH (2187.5)COMPRESSION■ COMPRESSION (2187.8)
S3
Z: (15) 1982 ■ T: (01) 2325 ■
POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1569.9)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (2194.0)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1902 | 2 1764 | 3 1982 | 4 1729 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 S ANRAKU JPN Top 10 ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1770 | 1Z 1T ▲ 41 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 44 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 44 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 36 Elo | 99.9 | 1935 |
| 2 T NARASAKI JPN Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1948 | 1Z 1T ▲ 16 Elo | 1Z ▼ 13 Elo | 1Z ▼ 5 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 21 Elo | 70.0 | 1967 |
| 3 S BAILEY USA at home ▲ 14 better than predicted | 1774 | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | 1Z ▲ 2 Elo | 2Z ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 27 Elo | 69.9 | 1831 |
| 4 T ROBERTS GBR ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1845 | 1Z 1T ▲ 20 Elo | 1Z ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z ▲ 3 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 2 Elo | 69.7 | 1870 |
| 5 D SANO JPN ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1819 | 2Z 3T ▼ 4 Elo | 1Z ▲ 5 Elo | 2Z ▼ 1 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 31 Elo | 69.5 | 1850 |
| 6 H V.DUYSEN BEL Top 10 ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1742 | 5Z 5T ▼ 22 Elo | 1Z ▲ 8 Elo | 1Z ▲ 10 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 28 Elo | 69.2 | 1766 |
| 7 Z GALLA USA at home ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1789 | 1Z 4T ▲ 4 Elo | 4Z ▼ 25 Elo | - ▼ 40 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 19 Elo | 59.2 | 1751 |
| 8 N MARCUS ISR ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1805 | 3Z 3T ▼ 7 Elo | 2Z ▼ 6 Elo | - ▼ 44 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 11 Elo | 59.2 | 1764 |
| 9 M MAWEM FRA ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1766 | 1Z 1T ▲ 25 Elo | 1Z ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z ▲ 9 Elo | 3Z ▼ 43 Elo | 54.8 | 1759 |
| 9 J POSCH AUT ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1738 | 2Z 2T ▲ 13 Elo | 1Z ▲ 5 Elo | 1Z ▲ 12 Elo | 1Z ▼ 16 Elo | 54.8 | 1752 |
| 11 C DUFFY USA at home ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1813 | 2Z 4T ▼ 11 Elo | 1Z ▲ 3 Elo | 3Z ▼ 5 Elo | 1Z ▼ 14 Elo | 54.4 | 1786 |
| 12 A WALLER USA at home ▲ 9 better than predicted | 1750 | 3Z 4T ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z ▲ 10 Elo | 3Z ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z ▼ 14 Elo | 54.3 | 1741 |
| 13 R KAYOTANI JPN ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1778 | 4Z 5T ▼ 29 Elo | 1Z ▲ 9 Elo | 4Z ▼ 8 Elo | 1Z ▼ 4 Elo | 54.0 | 1746 |
| 14 J CHON KOR ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 1829 | - ▼ 97 Elo | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | 2Z ▲ 6 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 27 Elo | 44.9 | 1778 |
| 15 Y OGATA JPN ▼ 13 worse than predicted | 1835 | 2Z 2T ▲ 9 Elo | 1Z ▲ 0 Elo | - ▼ 33 Elo | 1Z ▼ 9 Elo | 44.8 | 1809 |
| 16 G LEVIN ISR ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1688 | 1Z 2T ▲ 26 Elo | 3Z ▼ 10 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | 1Z ▲ 0 Elo | 44.7 | 1680 |
| 17 N RUSEV BUL ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1707 | 1Z 1T ▲ 31 Elo | 5Z ▼ 32 Elo | - ▼ 25 Elo | 2Z ▼ 8 Elo | 44.5 | 1677 |
| 18 E GRUZITIS LAT ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1701 | 2Z 2T ▲ 19 Elo | 4Z ▼ 18 Elo | 2Z ▲ 10 Elo | - ▼ 69 Elo | 44.4 | 1650 |
| 19 R FULKERSON USA at home ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1723 | 4Z 4T ▼ 5 Elo | 2Z ▲ 0 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | 2Z ▼ 3 Elo | 44.2 | 1697 |
| 20 H MCARTHUR GBR ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 1826 | 1Z ▼ 26 Elo | 5Z ▼ 35 Elo | 2Z ▲ 7 Elo | 1Z ▼ 3 Elo | 39.5 | 1769 |
| 21 A KHAZANOV ISR ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1808 | - ▼ 86 Elo | 1Z ▲ 9 Elo | 1Z ▲ 13 Elo | 1Z ▼ 1 Elo | 30.0 | 1749 |
| 22 N COLLIN BEL ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 1762 | 4Z ▼ 25 Elo | 1Z ▲ 8 Elo | - ▼ 33 Elo | 2Z ▼ 6 Elo | 29.6 | 1710 |