Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F2
Z: (05) 1982 ■ T: (05) 1975 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1496.6)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (1780.5)
F3
Z: (06) 1809 ■ T: (04) 2080 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1395.4)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1390.3)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1876.4)TECHNICAL■ TECHNICAL (1872.5)
F4
Z: (06) 1787 ■ T: (05) 1948 ■
FINGERS■, FINGERS (1384.9)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1391.9)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1757.6)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (1761.3)
F1
Z: (05) 1962 ■ T: (04) 2040 ■
PRESS■, PRESS (1485.8)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1485.4)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1529.4)PRESS■, PRESS (1851.4)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1851.3)DELICATE■ DELICATE (1861.6)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2040 | 2 1975 | 3 1809 | 4 1948 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 T NARASAKI JPN Top 10 ▬ | 1967 | 1Z 1T ▲ 19 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 5 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 7 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 14 Elo | 99.7 | 2002 |
| 2 S ANRAKU JPN Top 10 ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1935 | 2Z 4T ▼ 16 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 8 Elo | 1Z 3T ▼ 3 Elo | 99.0 | 1928 |
| 3 T ROBERTS GBR ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1870 | 4Z ▼ 39 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 13 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 15 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 22 Elo | 83.9 | 1855 |
| 4 S BAILEY USA at home ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1831 | 4Z 4T ▼ 3 Elo | - ▼ 77 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 11 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 25 Elo | 74.1 | 1792 |
| 5 D SANO JPN ▬ | 1850 | 1Z 2T ▲ 32 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 10 Elo | 3Z ▼ 72 Elo | 3Z ▼ 69 Elo | 68.9 | 1731 |
| 6 H V.DUYSEN BEL Top 10 ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1766 | - ▼ 57 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 27 Elo | 1Z ▼ 4 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 28 Elo | 59.8 | 1764 |