Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S1
Z: (19) 1937 ■ T: (14) 2136 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1425.4)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1423.8)PRESS■, PRESS (1423.9)PRESS■, PRESS (1714.2)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1716.9)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (1721.6)
S3
Z: (18) 1862 ■ T: (03) 2310 ■
POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1325.6)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (2137.7)
S4
Z: (18) 1904 ■ T: (06) 2261 ■
TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1408.6)TECHNICAL■ TECHNICAL (2014.0)
S2
Z: (19) 1824 ■ T: (04) 2289 ■
TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1307.7)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1305.0)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1308.1)SLOPER■, SLOPER (2092.1)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (2092.5)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (2095.3)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2136 | 2 2289 | 3 2310 | 4 2261 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 N GROSSMAN USA at home ▬ | 2015 | 2Z 2T ▼ 4 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 19 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 22 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 8 Elo | 99.5 | 2060 |
| 2 F GIBERT FRA ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1880 | 1Z 1T ▲ 25 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 15 Elo | 1Z ▼ 1 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 22 Elo | 84.7 | 1941 |
| 3 Z LUO CHN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1726 | 1Z 3T ▲ 24 Elo | 2Z ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 31 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 31 Elo | 84.5 | 1815 |
| 4 A SANDERS USA at home Top 10 ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1909 | 5Z 5T ▼ 48 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 38 Elo | 1Z ▼ 2 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 39 Elo | 84.1 | 1936 |
| 5 B RABOUTOU USA at home ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1930 | 2Z 2T ▲ 6 Elo | 1Z ▼ 4 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 25 Elo | 2Z ▼ 29 Elo | 69.7 | 1928 |
| 5 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1931 | 1Z 2T ▲ 14 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 20 Elo | 1Z ▼ 8 Elo | 2Z ▼ 27 Elo | 69.7 | 1930 |
| 7 S E.MIMOUNE FRA Top 10 ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1803 | 3Z 3T ▲ 7 Elo | 1Z ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 20 Elo | 69.4 | 1838 |
| 8 M NONAKA JPN ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1976 | 1Z 3T ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z ▼ 17 Elo | 2Z ▼ 21 Elo | 1Z ▼ 17 Elo | 54.7 | 1924 |
| 9 M RICHARDSON CAN ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1779 | 2Z ▼ 18 Elo | 1Z ▲ 7 Elo | 3Z ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 29 Elo | 54.6 | 1790 |
| 10 C MORONI ITA ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1878 | 1Z 3T ▲ 12 Elo | 1Z ▼ 3 Elo | 2Z ▼ 10 Elo | 2Z ▼ 22 Elo | 54.6 | 1855 |
| 11 R WIENAND GER ▲ 8 better than predicted | 1786 | 1Z 3T ▲ 20 Elo | 5Z ▼ 32 Elo | 1Z ▲ 7 Elo | 4Z ▼ 17 Elo | 54.1 | 1764 |
| 12 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 ▼ 8 worse than predicted | 1930 | 2Z 2T ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z ▼ 5 Elo | - ▼ 53 Elo | 1Z ▼ 5 Elo | 44.8 | 1879 |
| 12 M AOYAGI JPN ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1840 | 1Z 3T ▲ 14 Elo | - ▼ 71 Elo | 1Z ▲ 7 Elo | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | 44.8 | 1803 |
| 14 K DEBEVEC SLO ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1850 | 1Z 2T ▲ 18 Elo | 2Z ▼ 9 Elo | 2Z ▼ 5 Elo | - ▼ 54 Elo | 44.7 | 1808 |
| 15 K CONDIE USA at home ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1765 | 3Z 5T ▼ 1 Elo | 3Z ▼ 2 Elo | 2Z ▲ 1 Elo | - ▼ 47 Elo | 44.1 | 1721 |
| 16 F ITO JPN ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1858 | 4Z ▼ 46 Elo | 1Z ▲ 7 Elo | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 39.7 | 1827 |
| 16 J FÄRBER AUT ▬ | 1793 | 2Z ▼ 23 Elo | 2Z ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z ▲ 8 Elo | 2Z ▲ 2 Elo | 39.7 | 1783 |
| 18 R NAKAGAWA JPN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1698 | 5Z ▼ 20 Elo | 1Z ▲ 12 Elo | 1Z ▲ 11 Elo | 3Z ▲ 3 Elo | 39.4 | 1704 |
| 19 I KAZBEKOVA UKR ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 1899 | - ▼ 89 Elo | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z ▲ 5 Elo | 2Z ▼ 4 Elo | 29.9 | 1822 |
| 20 M SEKIKAWA JPN Top 10 ▼ 11 worse than predicted | 1902 | 2Z ▼ 34 Elo | 1Z ▲ 1 Elo | - ▼ 69 Elo | 4Z ▼ 23 Elo | 29.6 | 1790 |