Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S4
Z: (09) 2112 ■ T: (02) 2313 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1686.6)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (2197.0)
S1
Z: (14) 2113 ■ T: (06) 2273 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1677.6)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1678.6)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (2025.4)DELICATE■ DELICATE (2015.8)
S2
Z: (11) 2089 ■ T: (01) 2312 ■
COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1658.7)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1670.0)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (2232.3)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (2234.6)
S3
Z: (07) 2220 ■ T: (03) 2310 ■
COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1754.0)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1788.4)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1786.5)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (2128.4)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2137.9)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (2137.1)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2113 | 2 2089 | 3 2220 | 4 2112 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 M NONAKA JPN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1867 | 7Z 7T ▼ 19 Elo | 2Z ▲ 1 Elo | 7Z 7T ▲ 3 Elo | - ▼ 39 Elo | 56.3 | 1817 |
| 2 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▬ | 1778 | 1Z 2T ▲ 32 Elo | - ▼ 25 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 33 Elo | 49.7 | 1796 |
| 3 B RABOUTOU USA ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1809 | 5Z 7T ▼ 2 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 30 Elo | - ▼ 31 Elo | - ▼ 32 Elo | 48.7 | 1779 |
| 4 A MATSUFUJI JPN ▲ 11 better than predicted | 1636 | 4Z 4T ▲ 26 Elo | 5Z ▲ 10 Elo | 6Z ▲ 7 Elo | - ▼ 16 Elo | 43.5 | 1665 |
| 5 A SANDERS USA Top 10 ▬ | 1688 | 7Z ▼ 15 Elo | 5Z ▲ 13 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | 5Z 5T ▲ 44 Elo | 42.6 | 1711 |
| 6 S GEJO SRB ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1945 | 7Z ▼ 55 Elo | 3Z ▼ 5 Elo | 7Z ▼ 19 Elo | 3Z ▼ 3 Elo | 38.2 | 1863 |
| 7 A KEREM ISR ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1704 | - ▼ 31 Elo | 3Z ▲ 8 Elo | 6Z 6T ▲ 28 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | 33.8 | 1694 |
| 8 N GROSSMAN USA ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1921 | 3Z ▼ 24 Elo | 2Z ▼ 3 Elo | - ▼ 38 Elo | 4Z ▼ 6 Elo | 29.4 | 1853 |
| 9 M SEKIKAWA JPN Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1771 | 4Z ▼ 6 Elo | 4Z ▲ 1 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | 4Z ▲ 8 Elo | 29.1 | 1749 |
| 10 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1845 | 7Z ▼ 25 Elo | 2Z ▲ 5 Elo | - ▼ 23 Elo | 2Z ▲ 7 Elo | 28.9 | 1811 |
| 11 C MORONI ITA ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1781 | 7Z ▼ 12 Elo | - ▼ 31 Elo | 7Z ▲ 5 Elo | 7Z ▼ 3 Elo | 26.9 | 1744 |
| 12 H MEUL GER ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1791 | - ▼ 44 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | 4Z 5T ▲ 28 Elo | - ▼ 22 Elo | 24.3 | 1740 |
| 12 F GIBERT FRA ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1758 | 4Z 5T ▲ 15 Elo | - ▼ 28 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | 24.3 | 1713 |
| 14 S E.MIMOUNE FRA Top 10 ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1684 | 7Z 7T ▲ 15 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | - ▼ 15 Elo | - ▼ 13 Elo | 23.6 | 1657 |
| 15 J PILZ AUT ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1789 | 3Z ▼ 1 Elo | 2Z ▲ 11 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | - ▼ 25 Elo | 19.7 | 1758 |
| 16 L DÖRFFEL GER ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1720 | - ▼ 23 Elo | 4Z ▲ 5 Elo | - ▼ 10 Elo | 4Z ▲ 9 Elo | 19.4 | 1703 |
| 17 E MCNEICE GBR Top 10 ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1604 | 7Z ▲ 8 Elo | - ▼ 14 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | 4Z ▲ 13 Elo | 19.1 | 1606 |
| 18 K CULLEN USA ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1768 | - ▼ 29 Elo | - ▼ 26 Elo | 4Z ▲ 11 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | 9.7 | 1711 |
| 19 G TESIO ITA ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1837 | - ▼ 35 Elo | - ▼ 31 Elo | - ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | 0.0 | 1744 |
| 19 A MORI JPN ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1722 | - ▼ 19 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | - ▼ 10 Elo | - ▼ 14 Elo | 0.0 | 1667 |