Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S1
Z: (04) 2231 ■ T: (03) 2254 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1813.8)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1809.3)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (2079.2)DELICATE■ DELICATE (2077.5)
S2
Z: (06) 2180 ■ T: (01) 2297 ■
PRESS■, PRESS (1785.2)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1784.7)SLOPER■, SLOPER (2197.4)PRESS■ PRESS (2197.6)
S3
Z: (18) 1822 ■ T: (09) 2073 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1439.3)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1450.6)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1829.7)COORDINATION■ COORDINATION (1835.9)
S4
Z: (00) 2324 ■ T: (00) 2322 ■
SLOPER■, SLOPER (1866.5)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1891.4)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1881.2)PINCH■, PINCH (1863.6)SLOPER■, SLOPER (2249.1)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (2251.3)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2252.4)PINCH■ PINCH (2248.7)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2231 | 2 2297 | 3 2073 | 4 2322 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 M SCHALCK FRA Top 10 ▲ 8 better than predicted | 1704 | 1Z 1T ▲ 37 Elo | 5Z ▲ 1 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 30 Elo | - ▼ 19 Elo | 59.6 | 1754 |
| 2 T NARASAKI JPN Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1786 | 3Z 3T ▲ 25 Elo | 6Z ▼ 11 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 17 Elo | - ▼ 23 Elo | 58.9 | 1796 |
| 3 J CHON KOR at home ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1624 | - ▼ 15 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 38 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 32 Elo | - ▼ 10 Elo | 50.0 | 1670 |
| 4 M CORNU FRA ▲ 15 better than predicted | 1657 | 4Z 4T ▲ 30 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | 1Z ▼ 3 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | 34.4 | 1658 |
| 5 D LEE KOR at home Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1776 | - ▼ 31 Elo | 7Z ▼ 8 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 28 Elo | - ▼ 16 Elo | 34.3 | 1752 |
| 6 N UZNIK AUT ▲ 11 better than predicted | 1705 | - ▼ 22 Elo | - ▼ 19 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 20 Elo | - ▼ 9 Elo | 24.8 | 1679 |
| 6 Y FLOHÉ GER ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1667 | - ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 14 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 24 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | 24.8 | 1655 |
| 8 T ROBERTS GBR ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1737 | - ▼ 34 Elo | - ▼ 26 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 10 Elo | - ▼ 13 Elo | 24.6 | 1679 |
| 9 S AVEZOU FRA ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1804 | - ▼ 29 Elo | - ▼ 23 Elo | 3Z 5T ▼ 14 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | 24.4 | 1732 |
| 9 Y FUJIWAKI JPN ▲ 8 better than predicted | 1662 | - ▼ 14 Elo | - ▼ 13 Elo | 4Z 4T ▲ 2 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | 24.4 | 1633 |
| 11 M MILNE GBR ▬ | 1819 | - ▼ 28 Elo | 2Z ▲ 5 Elo | 2Z ▼ 25 Elo | - ▼ 14 Elo | 19.8 | 1760 |
| 12 Y OGATA JPN ▼ 10 worse than predicted | 1781 | - ▼ 21 Elo | 5Z ▲ 2 Elo | 2Z ▼ 23 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | 19.5 | 1730 |
| 13 H V.DUYSEN BEL Top 10 ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1549 | 6Z ▲ 14 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | 2Z ▲ 2 Elo | - ▼ 3 Elo | 19.4 | 1555 |
| 14 S LORENZI BEL ▬ | 1770 | - ▼ 21 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | 1Z ▼ 12 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | 10.0 | 1712 |
| 15 A G.LÓPEZ ESP ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1642 | - ▼ 9 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | 2Z ▼ 5 Elo | - ▼ 5 Elo | 9.9 | 1613 |
| 16 N COLLIN BEL ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1677 | - ▼ 11 Elo | - ▼ 12 Elo | 3Z ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | 9.8 | 1633 |
| 17 S BAILEY USA ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1753 | - ▼ 18 Elo | - ▼ 16 Elo | 4Z ▼ 31 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | 9.7 | 1685 |
| 17 M TERNANT FRA ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1695 | - ▼ 12 Elo | - ▼ 12 Elo | 4Z ▼ 21 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | 9.7 | 1646 |
| 19 R KAYOTANI JPN ▼ 13 worse than predicted | 1660 | - ▼ 14 Elo | - ▼ 14 Elo | - ▼ 66 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | 0.0 | 1569 |