Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S3
Z: (20) 1701 ■ T: (04) 2070 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1438.9)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (1880.1)
S4
Z: (18) 1687 ■ T: (04) 2032 ■
COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1477.6)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1476.2)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1868.2)COORDINATION■ COORDINATION (1869.7)
S2
Z: (08) 2089 ■ T: (01) 2159 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1822.5)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1800.1)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1988.3)DELICATE■ DELICATE (1974.1)
S1
Z: (09) 2035 ■ T: (00) 2168 ■
FINGERS■, FINGERS (1733.3)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1711.5)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1989.2)COMPRESSION■ COMPRESSION (1976.5)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2168 | 2 2159 | 3 2070 | 4 2032 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 P JENFT FRA Top 10 ▲ 18 better than predicted | 1713 | 1Z ▼ 16 Elo | 5Z ▼ 60 Elo | 3Z 5T ▼ 29 Elo | 4Z 6T ▼ 36 Elo | 68.2 | 1572 |
| 2 M SCHALCK FRA Top 10 ▲ 8 better than predicted | 1732 | 2Z ▼ 22 Elo | 5Z ▼ 40 Elo | 1Z ▼ 16 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 10 Elo | 54.4 | 1664 |
| 3 S ANRAKU JPN at home Top 10 ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1617 | 1Z ▼ 8 Elo | 7Z ▼ 44 Elo | 2Z ▼ 42 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 38 Elo | 54.2 | 1561 |
| 4 H V.DUYSEN BEL Top 10 ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1560 | 3Z ▼ 6 Elo | 7Z 7T ▲ 5 Elo | 2Z ▼ 22 Elo | 1Z ▼ 16 Elo | 53.3 | 1521 |
| 5 J CHON KOR ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1799 | - ▼ 105 Elo | - ▼ 84 Elo | 4Z 5T ▼ 35 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 23 Elo | 49.3 | 1614 |
| 6 M NARASAKI JPN at home ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1665 | 1Z ▲ 2 Elo | 4Z ▼ 12 Elo | 1Z ▼ 22 Elo | 4Z ▼ 61 Elo | 39.4 | 1572 |
| 7 E GRUZITIS LAT ▲ 8 better than predicted | 1604 | 1Z ▲ 7 Elo | 6Z ▼ 9 Elo | 1Z ▼ 9 Elo | 3Z ▼ 35 Elo | 39.3 | 1558 |
| 8 T NARASAKI JPN at home Top 10 ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1758 | 4Z ▼ 29 Elo | 5Z ▼ 24 Elo | 2Z ▼ 35 Elo | 1Z ▼ 17 Elo | 39.2 | 1653 |
| 9 K FUJII JPN at home ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1816 | - ▼ 104 Elo | - ▼ 66 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 12 Elo | 1Z ▼ 28 Elo | 34.6 | 1621 |
| 10 D LEE KOR Top 10 ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1816 | - ▼ 67 Elo | - ▼ 65 Elo | 4Z 5T ▼ 35 Elo | 1Z ▼ 26 Elo | 34.3 | 1636 |
| 11 Y FLOHÉ GER ▬ | 1722 | 4Z ▼ 23 Elo | - ▼ 43 Elo | 3Z ▼ 35 Elo | 2Z ▼ 27 Elo | 29.4 | 1598 |
| 12 L AVEZOU FRA ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1720 | - ▼ 48 Elo | 7Z ▼ 15 Elo | 2Z ▼ 18 Elo | 3Z ▼ 35 Elo | 28.9 | 1609 |
| 13 Y OGATA JPN at home ▼ 10 worse than predicted | 1839 | - ▼ 66 Elo | - ▼ 51 Elo | 1Z ▼ 9 Elo | 1Z ▼ 16 Elo | 20.0 | 1708 |
| 14 M TERNANT FRA ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1653 | - ▼ 27 Elo | - ▼ 23 Elo | 3Z ▼ 21 Elo | 1Z ▼ 2 Elo | 19.8 | 1585 |
| 15 M MAWEM FRA ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1629 | - ▼ 22 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | 3Z ▼ 16 Elo | 2Z ▼ 11 Elo | 19.7 | 1564 |
| 16 R KAYOTANI JPN at home ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 1621 | - ▼ 31 Elo | - ▼ 24 Elo | 5Z ▼ 36 Elo | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 19.6 | 1539 |
| 16 Y FUJIWAKI JPN at home ▬ | 1650 | - ▼ 27 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | 3Z ▼ 18 Elo | 3Z ▼ 25 Elo | 19.6 | 1564 |
| 18 N UZNIK AUT ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1718 | - ▼ 26 Elo | - ▼ 25 Elo | 5Z ▼ 40 Elo | 2Z ▼ 15 Elo | 19.5 | 1616 |
| 19 A PEHARC SLO ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1793 | 6Z ▼ 18 Elo | - ▼ 34 Elo | 2Z ▼ 16 Elo | - ▼ 104 Elo | 19.4 | 1633 |
| 20 J POPE GBR ▬ | 1628 | - ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 14 Elo | 5Z ▼ 21 Elo | - ▼ 57 Elo | 9.6 | 1527 |
