Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F2
Z: (06) 1489 ■ T: (03) 1788 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1410.7)DELICATE■ DELICATE (1668.4)
F3
Z: (06) 1550 ■ T: (00) 1971 ■
SLOPER■, SLOPER (1443.0)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1451.8)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1935.0)SLOPER■ SLOPER (1931.6)
F4
Z: (00) 1953 ■ T: (00) 1949 ■
TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1669.1)PRESS■, PRESS (1680.4)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1702.1)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1921.1)PRESS■, PRESS (1914.0)TECHNICAL■ TECHNICAL (1910.5)
F1
Z: (06) 1644 ■ T: (01) 1939 ■
COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1496.4)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1524.7)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1825.3)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (1839.5)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1939 | 2 1788 | 3 1971 | 4 1949 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 M SCHALCK FRA Top 10 ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1664 | 2Z 4T ▼ 14 Elo | 1Z 3T ▼ 3 Elo | 4Z ▼ 60 Elo | - ▼ 44 Elo | 59.1 | 1546 |
| 2 P JENFT FRA Top 10 ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1572 | 1Z ▼ 13 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z ▼ 8 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | 44.8 | 1530 |
| 3 H V.DUYSEN BEL Top 10 ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1521 | 7Z ▼ 62 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 19 Elo | 1Z ▼ 1 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | 44.1 | 1459 |
| 4 K FUJII JPN at home ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1621 | 7Z ▼ 71 Elo | 1Z ▼ 26 Elo | 1Z ▼ 1 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | 29.4 | 1507 |
| 5 S ANRAKU JPN at home Top 10 ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1561 | 1Z ▼ 6 Elo | 2Z ▼ 48 Elo | 7Z ▼ 66 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | 29.2 | 1421 |
| 6 J CHON KOR ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1614 | 6Z ▼ 50 Elo | 5Z ▼ 67 Elo | 2Z ▼ 4 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | 29.0 | 1483 |