Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S1
Z: (20) 1914 ■ T: (04) 2396 ■
PRESS■, PRESS (1362.0)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1372.7)PRESS■, PRESS (2203.2)DELICATE■ DELICATE (2205.3)
S2
Z: (20) 1907 ■ T: (10) 2224 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1381.1)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1379.6)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1890.7)COMPRESSION■ COMPRESSION (1890.7)
S4
Z: (20) 1962 ■ T: (13) 2202 ■
COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1428.5)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1414.2)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1813.2)COORDINATION■ COORDINATION (1824.2)
S3
Z: (03) 2416 ■ T: (01) 2467 ■
FINGERS■, FINGERS (1807.6)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1812.1)FINGERS■, FINGERS (2326.8)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (2327.3)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2396 | 2 1907 | 3 2467 | 4 2202 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Y FLOHÉ GER ▲ 8 better than predicted | 2059 | 3Z ▼ 34 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 23 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 22 Elo | 3Z 4T ▼ 25 Elo | 83.9 | 2045 |
| 2 M NARASAKI JPN ▲ 10 better than predicted | 1876 | 1Z 3T ▲ 29 Elo | 2Z 5T ▲ 7 Elo | - ▼ 16 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 18 Elo | 74.1 | 1916 |
| 3 T NARASAKI JPN Top 10 ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1949 | 3Z ▼ 19 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 18 Elo | 2Z ▲ 9 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 14 Elo | 69.3 | 1971 |
| 4 M MILNE GBR ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1983 | 1Z ▼ 4 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 24 Elo | - ▼ 25 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 24 Elo | 60.0 | 2005 |
| 5 Y OGATA JPN ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 2065 | 2Z ▼ 23 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 20 Elo | - ▼ 31 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 12 Elo | 59.8 | 2047 |
| 6 D LEE KOR Top 10 ▲ 2 better than predicted | 2035 | 2Z ▼ 24 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 21 Elo | - ▼ 36 Elo | 2Z 3T ▼ 2 Elo | 59.5 | 1998 |
| 7 J POSCH AUT ▲ 9 better than predicted | 1648 | 1Z 3T ▲ 36 Elo | 1Z ▲ 9 Elo | - ▼ 4 Elo | 3Z 4T ▲ 23 Elo | 59.3 | 1712 |
| 8 J SCHUBERT AUT ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1997 | 1Z 4T ▲ 20 Elo | 4Z ▼ 58 Elo | - ▼ 16 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 3 Elo | 59.1 | 1948 |
| 9 K FUJII JPN ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 2072 | 4Z ▼ 48 Elo | 1Z 4T ▲ 3 Elo | - ▼ 28 Elo | 5Z 6T ▼ 48 Elo | 58.5 | 1953 |
| 9 A MEGOS GER ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1744 | 1Z ▲ 12 Elo | 6Z 7T ▼ 1 Elo | - ▼ 5 Elo | 2Z 4T ▲ 22 Elo | 58.5 | 1772 |
| 11 J CHON KOR ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 1967 | 4Z ▼ 25 Elo | 1Z ▼ 13 Elo | 5Z ▲ 6 Elo | 2Z 4T ▲ 1 Elo | 53.9 | 1936 |
| 12 S LORENZI BEL ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1808 | 3Z ▼ 1 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 28 Elo | - ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z ▼ 14 Elo | 44.7 | 1815 |
| 12 M MAWEM FRA ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1677 | 1Z ▲ 16 Elo | 4Z ▼ 2 Elo | - ▼ 4 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 34 Elo | 44.7 | 1721 |
| 14 R KAWAMATA JPN ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1976 | 2Z ▼ 12 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 8 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | 6Z ▼ 67 Elo | 44.2 | 1887 |
| 15 H MCARTHUR GBR ▼ 8 worse than predicted | 1934 | 1Z 2T ▲ 28 Elo | 1Z ▼ 16 Elo | - ▼ 14 Elo | 7Z ▼ 58 Elo | 44.1 | 1875 |
| 16 Y FUJIWAKI JPN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1820 | 2Z ▲ 3 Elo | 6Z ▼ 36 Elo | - ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z 6T ▲ 23 Elo | 43.9 | 1804 |
| 17 M KLEESATTEL GER ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1839 | 2Z ▲ 2 Elo | 4Z ▼ 24 Elo | - ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z ▼ 2 Elo | 29.6 | 1808 |
| 18 N MARCUS ISR ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1849 | 3Z ▼ 7 Elo | 2Z ▼ 6 Elo | - ▼ 7 Elo | 3Z ▼ 14 Elo | 29.5 | 1816 |
| 19 P MARTIN GER ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1687 | 3Z ▲ 7 Elo | 3Z ▲ 1 Elo | - ▼ 4 Elo | 3Z ▲ 3 Elo | 29.4 | 1695 |
| 20 M TERNANT FRA ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1691 | 3Z ▲ 6 Elo | 3Z ▲ 0 Elo | - ▼ 4 Elo | 7Z ▼ 9 Elo | 28.9 | 1685 |