Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F4
Z: (05) 2119 ■ T: (00) 2467 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1549.3)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1542.7)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (2412.0)SLOPER■ SLOPER (2411.4)
F1
Z: (06) 2074 ■ T: (06) 2080 ■
COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1532.8)COORDINATION■ COORDINATION (1835.8)
F3
Z: (06) 2005 ■ T: (01) 2380 ■
PRESS■, PRESS (1447.8)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1473.0)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (2266.9)PRESS■ PRESS (2264.5)
F2
Z: (05) 2114 ■ T: (01) 2394 ■
FINGERS■, FINGERS (1510.8)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1520.4)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1536.2)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1532.4)FINGERS■, FINGERS (2304.1)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2304.9)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (2306.0)COMPRESSION■ COMPRESSION (2304.8)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2074 | 2 2394 | 3 2380 | 4 2467 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Y FLOHÉ GER ▲ 4 better than predicted | 2045 | 3Z 3T ▼ 23 Elo | 1Z ▼ 2 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 23 Elo | 4Z ▼ 29 Elo | 69.2 | 2014 |
| 2 M MILNE GBR ▲ 1 better than predicted | 2005 | 1Z 1T ▲ 19 Elo | 4Z 5T ▼ 7 Elo | 4Z ▼ 34 Elo | - ▼ 51 Elo | 59.0 | 1937 |
| 3 T NARASAKI JPN Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1971 | 3Z 4T ▼ 19 Elo | 2Z ▼ 4 Elo | 1Z ▼ 1 Elo | 3Z ▼ 2 Elo | 54.2 | 1945 |
| 4 Y OGATA JPN ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 2047 | 6Z 7T ▼ 63 Elo | 2Z ▼ 7 Elo | 3Z ▼ 16 Elo | 2Z ▲ 2 Elo | 53.5 | 1963 |
| 5 D LEE KOR Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1998 | 4Z 4T ▼ 35 Elo | 4Z ▼ 28 Elo | 4Z ▼ 27 Elo | 7Z ▼ 16 Elo | 52.9 | 1892 |
| 6 M NARASAKI JPN ▬ | 1916 | 2Z 2T ▲ 19 Elo | - ▼ 46 Elo | 2Z ▲ 2 Elo | 4Z ▼ 1 Elo | 44.4 | 1894 |