Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S1
Z: (20) 1822 ■ T: (19) 1899 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1278.2)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (1480.9)
S2
Z: (20) 1870 ■ T: (15) 2074 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1353.7)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1344.3)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1687.1)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (1693.1)
S3
Z: (15) 2075 ■ T: (03) 2390 ■
POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1528.4)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1535.2)PINCH■, PINCH (1544.8)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2207.2)PINCH■, PINCH (2207.2)SLOPER■ SLOPER (2207.1)
S4
Z: (15) 2089 ■ T: (10) 2219 ■
FINGERS■, FINGERS (1568.1)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1567.5)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1889.9)FINGERS■ FINGERS (1890.0)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1822 | 2 1870 | 3 2390 | 4 2219 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 N GROSSMAN USA ▬ | 2153 | 1Z 1T ▲ 5 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 6 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 11 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | 100.0 | 2183 |
| 2 M NONAKA JPN ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1998 | 1Z 1T ▲ 18 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 20 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 27 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 6 Elo | 99.8 | 2069 |
| 3 H MEUL GER ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1894 | 1Z 1T ▲ 23 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 18 Elo | 1Z ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 29 Elo | 84.9 | 1967 |
| 4 S OKAWACHI JPN ▲ 14 better than predicted | 1783 | 2Z 2T ▲ 27 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 23 Elo | 1Z ▲ 12 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 47 Elo | 84.5 | 1892 |
| 4 Z LUO CHN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1803 | 1Z 3T ▲ 22 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 41 Elo | 3Z ▼ 11 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 39 Elo | 84.5 | 1894 |
| 6 J PILZ AUT ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1964 | 1Z 1T ▲ 17 Elo | 2Z 4T ▼ 22 Elo | 2Z ▼ 7 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 10 Elo | 84.3 | 1962 |
| 7 A MATSUFUJI JPN ▲ 10 better than predicted | 1885 | 2Z 2T ▲ 8 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 34 Elo | 3Z ▼ 19 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 6 Elo | 84.2 | 1914 |
| 8 F ITO JPN ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1972 | 1Z 1T ▲ 15 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 8 Elo | 1Z ▼ 4 Elo | 5Z 5T ▼ 37 Elo | 84.1 | 1954 |
| 9 F GIBERT FRA ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1775 | 2Z 2T ▲ 14 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 11 Elo | - ▼ 35 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 20 Elo | 74.1 | 1789 |
| 10 S GEJO SRB ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1950 | 1Z 1T ▲ 16 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 18 Elo | 4Z ▼ 22 Elo | 1Z ▼ 16 Elo | 69.7 | 1946 |
| 10 A KEREM ISR ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1970 | 1Z 2T ▲ 2 Elo | 2Z ▼ 52 Elo | 1Z ▲ 7 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 21 Elo | 69.7 | 1948 |
| 12 V LUKAN SLO ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1735 | 2Z 2T ▲ 15 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 29 Elo | 2Z ▲ 9 Elo | 2Z ▼ 4 Elo | 69.6 | 1784 |
| 13 F STERRER AUT ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1938 | 1Z 1T ▲ 16 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 10 Elo | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | - ▼ 91 Elo | 59.9 | 1884 |
| 14 C SEO KOR ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1937 | 3Z ▼ 82 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 23 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 31 Elo | - ▼ 62 Elo | 59.7 | 1851 |
| 15 P KLINGLER SUI ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1899 | 1Z 1T ▲ 19 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 47 Elo | 1Z ▲ 3 Elo | 59.6 | 1863 |
| 16 C MORONI ITA at home ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1808 | 1Z 1T ▲ 24 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 13 Elo | - ▼ 38 Elo | - ▼ 38 Elo | 49.8 | 1776 |
| 17 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1771 | 2Z 2T ▲ 10 Elo | 2Z ▼ 12 Elo | 2Z ▲ 10 Elo | - ▼ 28 Elo | 44.6 | 1753 |
| 18 C COSCOY USA ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1880 | 1Z 2T ▲ 9 Elo | 4Z ▼ 57 Elo | - ▼ 36 Elo | 3Z ▲ 3 Elo | 44.4 | 1803 |
| 19 J KRUDER SLO ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1641 | 1Z 1T ▲ 31 Elo | 7Z ▼ 31 Elo | 3Z ▲ 14 Elo | - ▼ 17 Elo | 44.2 | 1640 |
| 20 H TOOTHILL GBR ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1841 | 4Z 4T ▼ 30 Elo | 2Z ▼ 15 Elo | - ▼ 24 Elo | 5Z ▼ 1 Elo | 43.9 | 1774 |