Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S1
Z: (17) 1964 ■ T: (13) 2069 ■
PRESS■, PRESS (1517.5)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1511.2)PRESS■, PRESS (1712.4)TECHNICAL■ TECHNICAL (1707.9)
S2
Z: (18) 1972 ■ T: (14) 2105 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1542.8)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1544.7)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1722.0)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (1724.0)
S4
Z: (14) 2041 ■ T: (05) 2271 ■
MANTLE■, MANTLE (1605.5)MANTLE■ MANTLE (2034.5)
S3
Z: (14) 2039 ■ T: (05) 2256 ■
COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1620.3)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1608.0)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1622.9)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (2027.9)COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (2028.5)FINGERS■ FINGERS (2029.2)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1964 | 2 1972 | 3 2039 | 4 2041 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 A KEREM ISR ▲ 8 better than predicted | 1816 | 1Z 2T ▲ 23 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 14 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 23 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 21 Elo | 99.3 | 1897 |
| 2 B RABOUTOU USA at home ▬ | 1967 | 1Z 1T ▲ 20 Elo | 3Z 6T ▼ 43 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 27 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 25 Elo | 99.3 | 1996 |
| 3 M NONAKA JPN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1938 | 1Z 1T ▲ 21 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 5 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 11 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 15 Elo | 99.0 | 1960 |
| 4 N GROSSMAN USA at home ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 2053 | 1Z 1T ▲ 14 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 14 Elo | 1Z ▼ 25 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 7 Elo | 84.8 | 2063 |
| 5 C SEO KOR ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1677 | 1Z 1T ▲ 33 Elo | 4Z 4T ▲ 11 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 34 Elo | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | 84.4 | 1761 |
| 6 F ITO JPN ▬ | 1864 | 1Z 1T ▲ 22 Elo | 3Z 6T ▼ 20 Elo | 1Z ▼ 5 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 30 Elo | 84.3 | 1891 |
| 7 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1970 | 1Z 1T ▲ 15 Elo | 1Z 4T ▼ 1 Elo | 1Z ▼ 15 Elo | 3Z ▼ 37 Elo | 69.5 | 1932 |
| 8 H TOOTHILL GBR ▲ 8 better than predicted | 1689 | 1Z 1T ▲ 29 Elo | 5Z 5T ▲ 9 Elo | 3Z ▼ 3 Elo | 1Z ▲ 9 Elo | 69.0 | 1733 |
| 9 G TESIO ITA ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1787 | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | 7Z ▼ 47 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 25 Elo | 2Z ▼ 1 Elo | 68.9 | 1790 |
| 10 N KURA JPN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1764 | 3Z 3T ▼ 2 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 28 Elo | - ▼ 46 Elo | 1Z ▲ 7 Elo | 59.5 | 1756 |
| 11 S GEJO SRB ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1888 | 2Z 4T ▼ 19 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 15 Elo | 5Z ▼ 33 Elo | - ▼ 61 Elo | 59.0 | 1796 |
| 12 J PILZ AUT ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 1905 | 2Z ▼ 44 Elo | 3Z 6T ▼ 15 Elo | 2Z ▼ 3 Elo | 2Z ▼ 5 Elo | 54.0 | 1838 |
| 13 F STERRER AUT ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1878 | 6Z ▼ 86 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 21 Elo | 2Z ▼ 2 Elo | 4Z ▼ 13 Elo | 53.9 | 1798 |
| 14 A HÖNIG GER ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1839 | 3Z ▼ 29 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 16 Elo | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | - ▼ 49 Elo | 44.6 | 1786 |
| 15 C COSCOY USA at home ▬ | 1796 | 2Z 2T ▲ 17 Elo | 3Z ▼ 30 Elo | 3Z ▼ 3 Elo | - ▼ 35 Elo | 44.4 | 1748 |
| 16 K CULLEN USA at home ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1807 | 2Z 2T ▲ 16 Elo | 6Z ▼ 46 Elo | - ▼ 44 Elo | 1Z ▲ 11 Elo | 44.3 | 1748 |
| 17 C MORONI ITA ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1771 | - ▼ 66 Elo | 5Z 6T ▲ 7 Elo | - ▼ 31 Elo | 6Z ▼ 1 Elo | 33.6 | 1690 |
| 18 Y ZHANG CHN ▬ | 1781 | 3Z ▼ 16 Elo | - ▼ 51 Elo | - ▼ 28 Elo | - ▼ 22 Elo | 9.8 | 1673 |
| 19 J WOOD GBR ▬ | 1569 | - ▼ 20 Elo | 6Z ▲ 4 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | - ▼ 10 Elo | 9.5 | 1536 |
| 20 G OH KOR ▬ | 1654 | - ▼ 46 Elo | - ▼ 35 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | - ▼ 9 Elo | 0.0 | 1557 |