Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S1
Z: (20) 1731 ■ T: (15) 1975 ■
SLOPER■, SLOPER (1200.3)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1212.6)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1590.0)SLOPER■ SLOPER (1579.2)
S2
Z: (17) 1944 ■ T: (12) 2100 ■
FINGERS■, FINGERS (1465.8)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1450.7)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1733.8)FINGERS■ FINGERS (1738.9)
S4
Z: (19) 1780 ■ T: (15) 1991 ■
COMPRESSION■, COMPRESSION (1309.6)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1297.6)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1316.0)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1617.8)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1626.6)COMPRESSION■ COMPRESSION (1623.7)
S3
Z: (13) 2206 ■ T: (12) 2205 ■
COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1686.9)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1685.3)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1784.2)COORDINATION■ COORDINATION (1785.6)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1975 | 2 2100 | 3 2205 | 4 1991 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 K FUJII JPN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1867 | 1Z 1T ▲ 23 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 12 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 22 Elo | 99.4 | 1927 |
| 2 Y OGATA JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1895 | 3Z 3T ▼ 13 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 21 Elo | 99.2 | 1931 |
| 2 A PEHARC SLO ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1833 | 1Z 1T ▲ 25 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 14 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 3 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 22 Elo | 99.2 | 1891 |
| 4 R FULKERSON USA at home ▲ 15 better than predicted | 1811 | 3Z 3T ▼ 1 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 27 Elo | 4Z 4T ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 23 Elo | 99.0 | 1863 |
| 5 R KAWAMATA JPN ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1903 | 3Z 3T ▼ 15 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 16 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 8 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 19 Elo | 98.9 | 1915 |
| 6 J CHON KOR ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1839 | 2Z ▼ 33 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | 4Z 5T ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 22 Elo | 84.2 | 1854 |
| 7 Y FLOHÉ GER ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1934 | 1Z 3T ▲ 5 Elo | 1Z 4T ▼ 8 Elo | 6Z ▼ 54 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 18 Elo | 84.0 | 1895 |
| 7 J SCHUBERT AUT ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1869 | 1Z ▼ 16 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 24 Elo | 6Z 6T ▼ 21 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 20 Elo | 84.0 | 1876 |
| 9 P JENFT FRA Top 10 ▲ 9 better than predicted | 1775 | 1Z 1T ▲ 28 Elo | 2Z ▼ 23 Elo | 6Z 6T ▲ 6 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 15 Elo | 83.8 | 1801 |
| 10 D LEE KOR Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1911 | 1Z 1T ▲ 30 Elo | 1Z ▼ 35 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 31 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 25 Elo | 83.6 | 1900 |
| 11 Z GALLA USA at home ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1750 | 1Z 1T ▲ 27 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 28 Elo | - ▼ 39 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 22 Elo | 75.0 | 1790 |
| 12 M MILNE GBR ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1889 | 1Z 2T ▲ 12 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 20 Elo | - ▼ 58 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 16 Elo | 74.9 | 1883 |
| 13 C DUFFY USA at home ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1739 | 1Z ▼ 10 Elo | 1Z ▼ 11 Elo | 7Z 7T ▲ 19 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 22 Elo | 68.0 | 1759 |
| 14 N PHILLIPS GBR ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1739 | 1Z 1T ▲ 27 Elo | 1Z ▼ 4 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 22 Elo | 60.0 | 1759 |
| 15 H MCARTHUR GBR ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1886 | 1Z 1T ▲ 28 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 20 Elo | - ▼ 73 Elo | 1Z ▼ 55 Elo | 59.9 | 1810 |
| 16 S BAILEY USA at home ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1892 | 1Z 3T ▲ 1 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 20 Elo | - ▼ 40 Elo | 1Z ▼ 50 Elo | 59.8 | 1825 |
| 17 G VEZONIK SLO ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1782 | 1Z 2T ▲ 17 Elo | - ▼ 78 Elo | 5Z 5T ▲ 28 Elo | 2Z ▼ 28 Elo | 59.0 | 1730 |
| 18 T TAKATA JPN ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1832 | 1Z ▼ 20 Elo | 3Z ▼ 28 Elo | 5Z 5T ▲ 23 Elo | 2Z ▼ 37 Elo | 53.9 | 1770 |
| 19 K DOHI JPN ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1913 | 1Z ▼ 27 Elo | - ▼ 84 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 13 Elo | 34.8 | 1798 |
| 20 Y FUJIWAKI JPN ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1829 | 2Z 2T ▲ 4 Elo | - ▼ 70 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | - ▼ 87 Elo | 24.8 | 1671 |