Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F4
Z: (04) 1963 ■ T: (03) 2013 ■
TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1548.5)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1566.1)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1556.0)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1879.5)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1881.0)SLOPER■ SLOPER (1883.9)
F1
Z: (04) 1916 ■ T: (03) 2023 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1513.1)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1511.4)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1889.5)SLOPER■ SLOPER (1889.5)
F2
Z: (06) 1797 ■ T: (04) 1958 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1474.6)DELICATE■ DELICATE (1799.2)
F3
Z: (06) 1675 ■ T: (03) 1997 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1372.8)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (1898.2)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1916 | 2 1958 | 3 1997 | 4 1963 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 N GROSSMAN USA ▬ | 1870 | 2Z 2T ▲ 10 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 18 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 5 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 22 Elo | 99.6 | 1925 |
| 2 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1702 | 1Z 1T ▲ 32 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 20 Elo | 1Z ▼ 6 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 19 Elo | 84.7 | 1767 |
| 3 B RABOUTOU USA ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1698 | - ▼ 53 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 14 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 30 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 22 Elo | 74.5 | 1715 |
| 4 S GEJO SRB ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1688 | 1Z 1T ▲ 33 Elo | 6Z ▼ 59 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 26 Elo | 5Z ▼ 26 Elo | 69.0 | 1662 |
| 5 C MORONI ITA ▬ | 1781 | - ▼ 68 Elo | 6Z 6T ▼ 24 Elo | 2Z ▼ 16 Elo | - ▼ 48 Elo | 33.9 | 1633 |
| 6 M AOYAGI JPN ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1650 | 1Z ▲ 3 Elo | 2Z ▼ 10 Elo | 1Z ▲ 2 Elo | - ▼ 51 Elo | 29.9 | 1598 |